I heard that something like this happened in an old superman villain. It took one season to defeat him. But later they defeat two by throwing a table at them

I think all the higher ups are afraid to admit they consume adult content so they will act as if it’s wrong.

If she is always getting scammed, she will ask for help. If she doesn’t, its her money and her problem

Yes. Who are you to decide what they watch and what they don’t? Op even decided on news sources. I thought this was obvious. Would you like her to come and decide what you get to watch and read too?

deleted by creator

Do not mess with an elderlycs tech if you are not willing to be always present and patient to fix any complain.

The real cuestión is why did you do it

Do not retaliate and you will be rewarded

I think this is bit what the post is trying to say.

A few days ago, visa and MasterCard forced steam to stop selling some games they didn’t like, and is not the first time. For many of us (I’m not a bitcoiner nor a crypto bro, my entire crypto wallet is 1usd) the first thought was “this is ridiculous. They have a duopoly so they get to decide the rules of the internet. This can be solved with crypto to remove all the unnecessary middlemen”. I felt the push. It reignited my interest in the tech and am once again seeing what’s out there, fees, and transaction times looking for a good balance

So the other server trusts what your account says? What is stopping you from sending fake likes?

I get that part. That sounds a of like the fediverse. But that cloning feature looks like you clone everything you do between many instances which is awesome, but I’m not sure how they could clone like counts. AFAIK they would either have to instruct the likers client to go like on the other instances, or trust the number reported by the OP

Thanks I’m interested on seeing how this handles things like likes

If he where to go to heaven. He would be unimpressed with the height

Can you link me to the feature? Or at least tell me the name so that I can look it up?

Yeah. I like the idea of separare WiFi. INE forma adults and another for kids

Yes. But honestly one of the main complains I’ve seen is not that this is wrong, but that they passed the law without having planned how they should do it while keeping the users safe and private.

Having a WiFi for kids and WiFi for adults could achieve the desired result without really compromising privacy (I think, but I’m not sure), or even enhancing it, since using Facebook on a kids WiFi would mean that Facebook thinks that you are a kids and KONWS they can’t legally track you

Also we could change some dumb rules on other like no posting nudity, since now if a user is using an adult WiFi, they should be treaded as adults. Want to post nudes on twitter? Sure, tag it as such and only adults will see them

In 5minutes on Lemmy we have come up with better ideas than the current law. They didn’t think about this nor heard the critics that have been saying this is a bad idea for years

But then again. What can we expect from people that trus t electronic voting

Edit: forgot this was about the UK. iDK if they have electronic voting

They can see and manage the router remotely no reason why they couldn’t do it. Mine let’s me turn off the router lights, change the WiFi password or turn of the WiFi all together.

Or even simples. Just like you have a guest WiFi, have a kids WiFi and an adult wifi

Then have the ISPs provide an interface to set which devices can access porn. No ID required.

Maybe the killer stayed there for hours until somebody switched tapes against. And lost other w minutes