

Its a bit confusing to me at first. Expectation: left eye goes to right hemisphere, right eye goes to left hemisphere. Reality: left eye output goes to both hemisphere, right eye goes to both hemispheres.
Decentralise everything!


Its a bit confusing to me at first. Expectation: left eye goes to right hemisphere, right eye goes to left hemisphere. Reality: left eye output goes to both hemisphere, right eye goes to both hemispheres.


12 what?
(No, its not mentioned whether the 12 are civilians or not, but it said it included members of a family, so I assume that means at least a few civilians have been killed)


The guy said, “Right now, the war is costing us $25 billion” or something close to that. Is it just me, or is that weird phrasing? Wouldnt you say “The war cost us … so far” rather than use the present tense “costing us”?


What do you mean?
Russian, сука блять (cyka blyat) (fucking shit, bitch whore). блять just sounds to me like someone mini vomiting or coughing while theyre cursing.
cyka - bitch blyat - fuck


No, its not too powerful. Its too chaotic. You cant control it.
EDIT: It seems I have misunderstood. I thought containment here referred to the harness, but they meant VM type of containment. I am still quite skeptical, but it looks like this model is quite good at finding and utilizing security flaws in software.


Mine too but honestly this is getting tiring.


Also, it could ignite a nuclear arming race and every country will try to get nukes.


Is is legal to commit war crimes in the United States? Because if it is, this becomes an ethical argument rather than a legal one.


I didnt find anything, which is kindof surprising. I did come across that Polymarket removed a bet on the fate of the stranded pilots.


Wow. They take their figureheads pretty seriously.


Oh, 16 degrees Fahrenheit. Still, thats quite a bit.


The article listed 800% fps gains due to ntsync. Wait, were those over fsync, or vanilla?


That, isnt even logical enough to not make sense.
That’s me. I’m that person.


Yes. The war is definitely not going to embolden pro-government sentiment in Iran in a rally behind the flag effect. /s


Its not like its easy for the people to stop. Person À and Person B are both involved in a scuffle. Cop or whatever tells them to stop. If A stops but B doesn’t stop, A just gets his ass kicked as a best case, or might get killed as a worst case if B has a weapon, for example. And vice versa. They have to both stop at the same time, which means expecting coordination between them which is ridiculous.
There’s also the very real possibility that the homeowner did stop and freeze, but person B kept attacking, and so the cop still shot at them since they didn’t both stop.
It’s ridiculous that this needs explaining to a supposedly trained cop.
It baffles me that it is even possible to summarily strip citizenship like that.
Like, it would be a lot more reasonable if people born on US soil, only in the future, no longer get citizenship.
But how can it be legal to remove citizenship by redefining the law, and then retroactively stripping people of it that no longer fit the definition? Like, isn’t this the same as making a law in 2026 banning smoking, and then going back and jailing anyone who has ever smoked?
Decades ago, Coca-Cola was trying to enter the market in Saudi Arabia. They ran an ad where “pilgrims” walked around a giant coke bottle, in the same way that Muslim pilgrims in Mecca walk around the Kaaba during Hajj and Umrah. It was very, very poorly received, to say the least, and many attribute it as the main reason why Pepsi has dominated the market instead of Coca-Cola.