• 5 Posts
  • 560 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 27th, 2023

help-circle
  • It sounds like that would require unifying the architecture of all fediverse platforms, which nobody is interested in and very much goes against the point (decentralization). Right now all of these platforms are written independently, with unique architectures and different programming languages.

    Suffice to say that, while it’s a nice thought, what you’re proposing is not really realistic, nor is it actually desired.


  • Matrix is not part of the fediverse, so that’s kind of a special case and doesn’t work the same at all as the rest.

    What you describe sounds very simplified, but let me assure you that there is nothing simple about this problem (I say that as a software engineer that has studied ActivityPub, the protocol underlying the fediverse).


  • It feels like they could all be part of one unified platform.

    They are. It’s called the fediverse.

    There’s no reason why any of these software options couldn’t support all the same stuff, as you say. But so far they have chosen not to.

    Maybe another option will come along one day that supports more of it at once.





  • SorteKanin@feddit.dktoFediverse@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Wait, you’re going to federate whether a user clicked on a link between instances?

    That seems kinda too far. I would not want other instances to know what I have or have not clicked. That’s a level of surveillance I’m not comfortable with and I fear how that data might be abused.

    Tbh I wouldn’t even want my own instance to track what I click



  • Let’s apply quality control on upvotes, so any post can get only 20 upvotes till it gets a specific amount of comments then the limit could be pumped up to 40 upvotes till it gets more comments, etc…

    Ultimately this is just limiting ways that people can vote. Voting is the democratic way to sort posts. I don’t think you can limit without ultimately influencing the system in unintended bad ways, since that will restrict how people can vote. Just let people vote.


  • I would never use an algorithmic feed for friends and family relations, so that’s simply not relevant. Tbh I don’t use “social media” with friends and family at all, I just use chats with them.

    how do you know you’re not missing something important or interesting?

    I mean this is just FOMO if you ask me. There always going to be something you’ll miss - it’s impossible to follow everything completely. I find it better to get a condensed view of the most important stuff, and then I can skip most of the rest.



  • This is a strange take on a website that doesn’t show a chronological feed (by default anyway).

    The problem is that chronological feeds suck hard when activity levels go above a certain threshold. You’d refresh the page and get an entire new set of posts because since last you refreshed, there were 100000 posts made. Chronological is not feasible in that scenario.





  • A low power AI actually seems like a good way to generate a ton of believable - but bad - data that can be used to fight the bad AI’s.

    Even “high power” AIs would produce bad data. It’s currently well known that feeding AI data to an AI model decreases model quality and if repeated, it just becomes worse and worse. So yea, this is definitely viable.


  • How does any of this matter when Trump won the popular vote? You can’t get around the fact that more than 50% of voters voted for Trump.

    I totally agree that your political system is fucked, but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that Trump won because he cheated the system or the election was rigged. Trump won because he convinced people to vote on him, and that’s the real problem.