正在发声
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
cm0002@libretechni.ca to cybersecurity@infosec.pub · 2 months ago

Microsoft's Silent Lockout: Why WireGuard, VeraCrypt & Windscribe Can No Longer Update Windows Users

techlore.tech

external-link
message-square
7
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
68
external-link

Microsoft's Silent Lockout: Why WireGuard, VeraCrypt & Windscribe Can No Longer Update Windows Users

techlore.tech

cm0002@libretechni.ca to cybersecurity@infosec.pub · 2 months ago
message-square
7
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
In more news not on my 2026 bingo card...Microsoft silently suspended the developer accounts for WireGuard, VeraCrypt, and Windscribe—three of the most important open source security tools that are consistently recommended to our audience. and none of these developers were notified. Not an email, not a warning, nothing.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • microcapybara@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    FFS… I’m not surprised but I’m still disappointed. Silver lining: the people (knowingly) using these tools are probably some of the easier Linux converts.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The type of person running WireGuard on Windows probably either can’t, or won’t use Linux.

  • saltnotsugar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

  • Davel23@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    The issue has been resolved, at least in VeraCrypt’s case:

    https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/discussion/general/thread/9620d7a4b3/?page=1#43c0

  • CyberSeeker@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • IncogCyberSpaceUser@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s your time limit on sharing articles? 24 hours? One week? I hadn’t seen this, so I’m glad it got posted, or even reposted.

      • Luccus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I find the expectation of a 24 hour news cycle terrible. The issue is seemingly not resolved, still relevant and still actionable. And even if something is resolved, sometimes it’s still relevant, even just as a retrospective.

        The whole “nothing should be older than a day” mentality feels like the news-cycle equivalent to watching subway surfer with jiggling keys while playing cookie clicker in order to listen to a podcast.

  • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    The graphic for this way over the top

cybersecurity@infosec.pub

cybersecurity@infosec.pub

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!

Community Rules

  • Be kind
  • Limit promotional activities
  • Non-cybersecurity posts should be redirected to other communities within infosec.pub.

Enjoy!

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 80 users / day
  • 248 users / week
  • 842 users / month
  • 2.32K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 6.22K subscribers
  • 918 Posts
  • 1.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • shellsharks@infosec.pub
  • tweedge@infosec.pub
    cake
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org