Maybe a human front half (including the legs) and horse rear half? It would seriously suck to run with 2 human legs and 2 horse legs.

  • qualia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If c = centaur, h = horse, m = man

    c = 0.5h + 0.5m

    0.5c + 0.5m = 0.5h + 0.5m + 0.5m = 0.5h + 1m

    Normalizing we get (0.5h + 1m)(2/3) = (1/3)h + (2/3)m

    The horse aspects are getting more diluted by the extra human genes (or parts). As others have observed I’m also imagining a centaur whose front legs are human, but has a wicked rear horse kick.

      • qualia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        There’s always a normalization step unless two animals go in and two come out. In sexual reproduction it’s meiosis for example. In your example you’re just pre-normalizing. I may still be wrong about the (2/3):(1/3) ratio though.

        Edit: If centaurs reproduced sexually with humans though they’d have 50% centaur offspring and 50% fully human. That’s assuming half their diploid chromosome count comes from each species and they can somehow compatibly align. Lulz.