IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Comics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 21 days agoWikiPedia:Neutral Point of Viewlemmy.mlimagemessage-square88linkfedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down147
arrow-up1108arrow-down1imageWikiPedia:Neutral Point of Viewlemmy.mlIndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Comics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square88linkfedilink
minus-squareBrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down4·21 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squaresad_detective_man@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down6·edit-221 days ago (Your post got removed but mine didn’t. Somehow the hivemind missed that I was agreeing with you)
minus-squarem532@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down4·20 days agoThe dog can easily be interpreted as wikipedia, preventing edits. You scored an own goal.
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·20 days agoIt doesn’t count as an own goal if you have to use a fringe interpretation to reverse the meaning lol
minus-squaresad_detective_man@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·20 days agoNo, in this place that’s totally valid. This is like the discourse equivalent of Appalachia inbred bloodlines
minus-squareRiverRock@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·19 days ago The hivemind 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
minus-squareRiverRock@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·19 days ago“Everyone capable of debunking my half-baked ideas about the world is an inhuman machine so I don’t need to think about what they say.”
minus-squareEugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·17 days agoIt’s funny how calling them out gets removed/banned but they aren’t a echo chamber hivemind.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down4·21 days agoYou sure can. Your changes will immediately be reverted, you’ll be banned, and, in my case, you’ll be doxed, but you can do it.
minus-squaregoferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down4·21 days ago in my case, you’ll be doxed, but you can do it. Wtf Wikipedia editors
minus-squarepinto@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down11·20 days agoI’m sure they have proof that happened. I’m sure of it.
minus-squareFleetwoodLinux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·20 days agoOh yes they should 100% totally point us to where they got doxxed that makes so much sense, it definitely wouldn’t lead to more problems for them
minus-squarepinto@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down10·20 days ago in my case, you’ll be doxed, but you can do it. That happened.
Removed by mod
(Your post got removed but mine didn’t. Somehow the hivemind missed that I was agreeing with you)
The dog can easily be interpreted as wikipedia, preventing edits.
You scored an own goal.
It doesn’t count as an own goal if you have to use a fringe interpretation to reverse the meaning lol
No, in this place that’s totally valid. This is like the discourse equivalent of Appalachia inbred bloodlines
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Removed by mod
“Everyone capable of debunking my half-baked ideas about the world is an inhuman machine so I don’t need to think about what they say.”
It’s funny how calling them out gets removed/banned but they aren’t a echo chamber hivemind.
You sure can. Your changes will immediately be reverted, you’ll be banned, and, in my case, you’ll be doxed, but you can do it.
Wtf Wikipedia editors
I’m sure they have proof that happened. I’m sure of it.
Oh yes they should 100% totally point us to where they got doxxed that makes so much sense, it definitely wouldn’t lead to more problems for them
That happened.
It did, yes.