• butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Explain to me how continuing to exploit economically marginalized people with the current gig economy is better without abstract nonsense like “we’re crushing the human soul by using delivery robots.”

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      continuing to exploit economically marginalized people

      Stop twisting my progressive language to suit your ends.

      Removing jobs from these people without giving them anything else in return is economically marginalizing them.

      Not to mention, I just think more people need to be brought face-to-face, through jobs or otherwise, and I genuinely think you’re a bad person if you don’t.

          • butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Why not? It’s a great idea. We need people to have any jobs, even terrible, exploitative jobs, and the jobs should be face to face. Back to manual construction! It’s clearly the better path forward.

              • butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Yes because there is no difference in degree at all. Benefitless gig work for the largest, most evil, and anti union companies is literally the exact same as every other job. That’s definitely how communism works. It’s making sure that we keep the worst possible jobs.

                • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Can you explain? How exactly is letting the largest, most evil, anti-union companies get the robots that they want of any injury to them?

                  You use this word ‘evil’, but I don’t think it means anything to you. I think it means you don’t want to be a delivery boy.

                  You know what? I’ll pick up a shovel. It’s good excercise.

                  • butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    Jesus you’re naive. Find me an industry more predatory and exploitative than the delivery gig economy. There are a few, but not many. You virtue signal like a progressive but you’re here simping for one of the worst industry segments and pretending it’s progressive by tossing out random abstract bullshit about how robots are evil and people are struggling. Maybe consider the actual material consequences of your comically childish ideas for once.