• imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That leaves Ukraine three options. The first is to rely on Europe stepping in to supply the weapons and equipment it needs. The second – proposed earlier this month by Zelensky – was to buy US made weapons from Washington with European money. The third is to make the weapons it needs in Ukrainian factories, funded by money from European allies.

    where is the “total capitulation” option? remarkable how western press is still producing these fantastical articles.

    • hardcoregek@reddthat.comBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because Ukrain is a soverein state and doesnt want to become Russian? I applaude the ressiliance Ukrain has against Russia.

      • m532@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sovereign? Why do liberals keep saying this word in the context of ukraine? Its not only wrong, but also, I don’t see how its relevant. But maybe it means something else to libs. Maybe it means “ruled by ‘whites’” again…

        • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Sovereign means signing a mineral deal for nearly all of your natural resources in exchange for dwindling material support after you genocided too many russian-speakers and the neighboring country of the same ethnicity had to intervene.

          • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sovereign means having to kneel before the US president in turn at the white house and enduring being scolded in national television.

      • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Sounds like they gave that up when they decided to become a Nazi state dedicated to being a proxy for the imperialist west.

        I applaud Russia for not justifiably shooting every Ukrainian soldier in the head as they go. Would be the best move imo. Anyways you get to watch the german horse-cock polishers collapse into a desperate gang of Nazis trying to stay alive again as Russia moves in. Enjoy, libshit!

        Also you type like a dipshit, Slabba Poopani!!!

      • EuthanatosMurderhobo@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Russia doesn’t particularly want Ukraine either. Just the shoreline to make Transnistria survivable and Kharkov for Moscow’s safety. Ideally. I’m not even sure the shitlibs in Kremlin think that way.

        Hungary or whoever can have the rest and deal with the most rabid nazis there, honestly.

        • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hungary or whoever can have the rest

          oh god no, hungary can barely run itself, dont give us more land and especially dont give us non-hungarian citizens, we cant be trusted

          • EuthanatosMurderhobo@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            There can just be a landlocked “sovereign” piece left. But that’ll be like… Europe’s ISIS or something.

            Honestly, Russia is best equiped to deal with this, what with FSB having experience with the sort of CtO that will definitely be needed in Ukraine afterwards from the second Chechen war. It’s just…again? Shit took some ten years last time.