cm0002@piefed.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoBeware, another "wonderful" conservative instance to "free us" has appeared media.piefed.worldimagemessage-square595linkfedilinkarrow-up1795arrow-down182
arrow-up1713arrow-down1imageBeware, another "wonderful" conservative instance to "free us" has appeared media.piefed.worldcm0002@piefed.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square595linkfedilink
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·2 days agoCan’t we apply the same logic with leftists?
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days ago Can’t we apply the same logic with leftists? It is imperative (to someone) that we do. Otherwise folks might wise up and get angry at billionaires.
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days agoSo if a pro-palestine rally has a jihadist, then they’re all jihadists?
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoThe important thing is that we fight each-other, instead of requiring billionaires to play by any rules.
minus-squareubergeek@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agoIf they don’t eject the jihadist, then yes. And, frankly, I don’t know many, if any, leftists who would tolerate a jihadist, as they are just a different type of religious fundamentalist right winger.
Can’t we apply the same logic with leftists?
It is imperative (to someone) that we do. Otherwise folks might wise up and get angry at billionaires.
So if a pro-palestine rally has a jihadist, then they’re all jihadists?
The important thing is that we fight each-other, instead of requiring billionaires to play by any rules.
lmao true
If they don’t eject the jihadist, then yes. And, frankly, I don’t know many, if any, leftists who would tolerate a jihadist, as they are just a different type of religious fundamentalist right winger.