Court: “Because Trump said to” may not be a legally valid defense

arstechnica.com

Court: “Because Trump said to” may not be a legally valid defense

arstechnica.com

Hellfire103@lemmy.ca to

Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months ago

The “arbitrary and capricious” standard strikes down another administration action.

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

Not The Onion@lemmy.world

nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from…
…credible sources, with…
…their original headlines, that…
…would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

21 users / day
21 users / week
21 users / month
21 users / 6 months
0 local subscribers
18.9K subscribers
169 Posts
0 Comments
Modlog

mods:
kescusay@lemmy.world