I think the bad consequences are so bad they completely nullify any good.
Ok kids are more talking in person and touching grass. At the same time though corporations now have even more personal data to sell to brokers and hackers are getting ahold of, including those children’s information (you know the very people these age restriction laws where supposedly going to help.)
I didn’t say there wouldn’t be negative consequences. In fact, I said there would be. I’m just curious what positive could come from it.
And the answer is none, that’s how bad the negatives are, any hypothetical you can think of is defecto nullified by the negative
We’ll see. That’s a really closed-minded opinion.
Yes so closed minded. How dare one have concern about privacy, data security, and low trust in government and corporations known to sell your data
It’s closed minded when you believe that the two are not mutually exclusive.
Because they more or less are?
Did I miss somewhere that the silicon corporates actually do a good job in respecting privacy and keeping kids away from problematic content?
I’m confused. Do you believe that you can have good AND bad consequences, or because there are bad consequences you cannot have good consequences?
I think the bad consequences are so bad they completely nullify any good.
Ok kids are more talking in person and touching grass. At the same time though corporations now have even more personal data to sell to brokers and hackers are getting ahold of, including those children’s information (you know the very people these age restriction laws where supposedly going to help.)