• jcr@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    In France, the ministry of Economics just announced that 13000 millionaires did not pay income tax in 2025 … and our social security (health insurance, jobless minimun income, etc) was founded on the principle of taxing the wealthy. So they (liberals) now say that social security is not working as intended and the state should delegate these things to “for profit” organizations … for “efficiency”

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    Buy borrow die is a very real economic strategy.

    Acquire assets, never sell them, use them as collateral for bank loans, use that capital as collateral for further bank loans. Never sell, no capital gains tax.

    Bank loans aren’t considered income therefore not subject to being taxed.

    Die rich, your kids inherit the money Scott free.

    • wabasso@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Don’t the unpaid loans get collected from the estate upon death, and the inheritors get whatever is left?

      Still a tax dodge, but sounds like the wealth would reduce each generation?

      I also still agree capital concentration is still occurring. Probably due to those loans getting used for excessive gains on the stock market. But those buys and sells would trigger capital gains tax.

      Again not saying I’m ok with all this wealth concentration, just feels like a lot of nuance is missing here.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I was being concise so as to keep the comment short. But I recommend you look into it. It’s a very real thing and it’s completely legal.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    Henry Ford said, “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    this is also pretty good vulnerability, should people start to think at somepoint that maybe billionaires shouldnt have all the wealth in the world. I wonder how the ones who have loaned them money would feel if the asset they have loaned the money for would just… go away.

    Any person should consider billionaires like foreign occupation, though the occupation consists the entire planet. Maybe we shouldn’t eat the rich, but eat their art collections.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Tax portfolio loans over a certain amount. That’s pretty much it. Sure, there will need to be some moving parts beyond that, but basically if you treat a loan as an income rather than something like a primary residence purchase in the buyer’s own name, it gets taxed.

    • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think the ‘unrealized assets’ should be taxed as ‘realized’ if they are used as collateral. Yes, it would affect the reverse mortgages and such, or home equity loans, but fuck it, I’d take those relatively small pains against the massive societal gains.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yes, this. Tax collateral as advance on capital gains and the whole incentive to dodge taxes with loans go away and it remains fair too

        You could make exceptions for loans taken to improve the same asset (home improvement loans) but you’d have to pass strict audits to get the exception approved

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t know what the financial consequences would be. Taxing unrealized assets would also have to have limits because so many retirement funds and the like are unrealized gains, we don’t want to hurt people’s ability to retire. That’s why putting a tax on trying to sidestep paying capital gains makes more sense. We’re not going to figure out how that all works here today. People won’t sit on unrealized gains, they’re going to have to use them in some fashion even if just as collateral, and we need to tax whatever workarounds they use to make those funds work for them.

            • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Then make it also apply for LLC, or for everyone except (list). I mean every set can be quantified.

              • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                But then LLc’s can also be legit businesses, and sometimes moving money to an LLc can be a legit investment in a company and not just a shell.

                Look, I already said there’s a lot of moving parts here and and we’re not going to solve it on Lemmy, so no need to keep getting in the weeds over this issue.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    Coincidentally, I saw an article entitled “Buy, Borrow, Die”. If you don’t need to have a salary paying job (so not applicable to almost everyone I know or have ever met), you buy an asset let it grow, refinance it (borrowings grow), spend the money you borrowed (tax free) some for more assets, some for pleasure. Rinse and repeat until you die with a shitload of debt that then gets wiped out.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    The percentage of sociopaths involved with creating a society should never be greater than zero.

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yep.

    Saw a vid about doing that recently. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsDsDqIxgfg

    And when I searched for that again just now, saw there are dozens of others too, about “borrow until you die” and similar. “Tax is for the poor” they say.

    So much for progressive tax system.

    The whole system (not just the tax system) is broken by design.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    And they benefit the most from taxes too.

    Public education gives me better opportunities.

    Public education gives them thousands of literate employees who can do basic math, think logically, use technology, and learn anything new.

    This applies to everything from building roads to government scholarships and health programs. They benefit much more from the military too.