• Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yeah. Did you read it? I did. Tell me what you understood from the article you read on the precisely WHO was interviewed, because I have doubts on your reading comprehension.

      • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        there is nothing to discuss about ‘haters’ because they talked to real game devs not random haters on social media

        read the article, you, read the article, please, go and look what games the devs have made

        GO READ THE ARTICLE

        the only person jumping to conclusions is YOU congrats!

        • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          ok so I asked you to list precisely what game devs they interviewed and you gave me nothing.

          Thanks for confirming you cannot parse the article of specific info.

          • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You replied to someone else bud, and I’m not chatgpt for you I won’t parse shit

            I literally played a game by doinksoft: GatoRoboto.

            Again, you don’t even have a point, unless you can explain why is it relevant who are the game devs? Are they too woke for you? Not enough? Do you think game designers are not game devs? Please explain your point for all of us to read.

            • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              If you bother reading the article, you’ll note that the majority of developers interviewed are not people who would need this technology to begin with. Like all technologies, it is a choice to integrate it.

              This article selected specifically for voices that were already against it/had no need for it.

              Whether the tech is good or bad is irrelevant, because the article is horribly biased in one direction.

              • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Well let’s hope the people who NEED it are vocal about it because I don’t see them anywhere.

                Idk man I guess former animator for RDR2 doesn’t need it. I’m gonna assume you think indie devs or 2D games don’t need it.

                I guess only gooners need it, they are gonna integrate it like nude mods and other bs, they already love to pass AI filters on women

                Thanks for making me waste worktime reading the article for the 3rd time today because I was in doubt with myself but every time it stayed the same

                Maybe the article is not biased, maybe, just maybe, the tech deserves this huge backlash because it is trash and nobody asked for it, not even game devs, or whatever you call people who make games but their games are not in need for this tech

                • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Maybe the article is not biased, maybe, just maybe, the tech deserves this huge backlash because it is trash and nobody asked for it, not even game devs, or whatever you call people who make games but their games are not in need for this tech

                  If you can’t recognize bias in an obviously biased article, then your media literacy skills need work so that you can recognize different types of bias.

                  Hell even the current popular LLM’s, which are glorified statistics chat bots, can see this pattern and identify heavily statistical traits of bias in this article.