

Are you asking why someone from the comic book villain speech country doesn’t recognise the distinction between arab, iranian, palestinian and muslim?
Are you asking why someone from the comic book villain speech country doesn’t recognise the distinction between arab, iranian, palestinian and muslim?
But Sanders has been talking in this manner for years. He participates in rhetoric that only has invasions and bombings as its natural conclusion, but when the great beast starts heaving to start killing people in earnest, he calls foul. This isn’t anti-war, it’s pro-war machine with anti-war aesthetics.
This also means that to the extent that they haven’t evolved beyond him, his audience are turn into a multitude supporting western/Usian foreign policy 99% of the way to hot conflict and getting cold feet there.
I did a search on him limited to results before this week, this is from the second link:
In 1999, Prevost took over the Midwestern Province of the Order of Saint Augustine.
He oversaw St. Rita of Cascia H.S. in Chicago’s Ashburn neighborhood as well as St. Jude parish and Providence Catholic High School in New Lenox, where school president Rev. Richard McGrath reported to Prevost.
McGrath was forced out of his position in 2017, after a Providence student reported seeing a nude image of a boy on his cell phone while he watched a wrestling match. He was later accused of sexual abuse by a former Providence student. The Midwestern Province paid $2 million in 2023 to settle the case.
All the king’s donkeys and all the king’s spooks know well they can’t destroy Ansar Allah by bombing them, trying to kill them from afar. They also can’t take the risks involved in an invasion. They know the main factor that makes usians wary of their adventurism is corpses coming back. Not only that, they can’t produce the necessary political will for anything more, the republicans aren’t popular enough and democrats can’t talk about Yemen without admitting they never have a shit what the Zionist entity was up to.
All glory to the people and fighters of Yemen!
I think they overestimated what effect the loss of nordstream and western trade would have and the efficacy their vassals armed by NATO while underestimating Russia’s other partners and their industrial and military capacity.
The incorrect assumptions are different every time but it’s always bourgeois leadership puffing their own fumes.
First of all, it’s paywalled, I can’t read a thing. The text would be appreciated. A bit long so I’m just sharing an archive link that works (recent ones don’t seem to)
https://web.archive.org/web/20150505185403/https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-08-18/why-ukraine-crisis-west-s-fault
Second,
Published on August 18, 2014
Fuckall changed in 8 years between this and the outbreak of the SMO and the 3 years since. The histories will write how this hegemony played with the fate of yet another nation and had no scruples about tossing their toy to the flames for the sake of their endless ambitions.
I find it refreshing to see a country that has serious, realistic and possibly pessimistic projections. They’re only expecting to surpass the competition on LNG carriers and be able to compete on aircraft in the coming 6 years, among a bunch of industries. Westerners usually predict they’ll cure cancer by 2030 (year of I won’t be in office anyway, slowly becoming 2035) and cure death by 2050. (year of my voters will be dead by then)
I’m of so many minds in this, no idea how to feel.
Worst case scenario, this is actually a plan by the intelligence fuckers to cover their backsides better. The global south and any leftist worth a thing is now well aware and wary of anything that has to do with the NED. This could be a way to supply funds to their fascist puppets with even less scrutiny and notice.
I’m really hoping this is just the bourgeois dictatorship putting itself through interesting times. Decades of anti-communist propaganda accrued to a debt to truth, wouldn’t it be wonderful if they’ve fallen for their own deception and that debt is due?
They’ll never stop whining either, as though that ever changed anything
“Why not let this drag out? It only costs relatively civilised, relatively european lives.”
I feel like asking whether you were born yesterday. Have you not seen any anti-AES propaganda, or the rounds Western MSM make when they’re pushing some anti-AES horseshit? It’s always innuendos, insinuations, half-truths and fabrications that were corrected by the text itself or its sources, but the intention is that the liberal audience doesn’t think sufficiently deeply to realise the insinuations have no basis or that they don’t read long enough to see the part of the article counter to the headline.
If you think there’s nothing to think about, ask yourself this: Why mention “Chinese-made” in the lead? The average article regarding other conflicts doesn’t mention where the weapons come from, doubly so for the Zionist entity since most of their weapons are Usian. What’s different here?