Oh, good catch! I have to say I don’t usually look at what specific tls version websites use. I’ll be paying attention to this for a bit

1. private, secure dns, so they don’t know the domains you’re visiting
2. https everywhere, so they can’t see any of the data you’re sending or receiving

All that’s left is what ip’s you’re connecting to. Which is useless half the time, especially since most websites are behind cloudflare or some other anti-ddos proxy already.

Also, don’t use the web browser that came with your phone. Some manufacturers and isp’s might enjoy adding tracking into those. Some, like Apple, even got caught not encrypting amy of that.

Side note:

• https everywhere is pretty much the standard in modern web browsers
• an adblocker can still help a lot in blocking trackers
• a secure dns you can find in your browser settings

If you just want a secure connection, you can use a reverse proxy with certbot and nginx. Plenty of people have already done this and you can find their work on hub.docker.com

Why did firefox kill pwa support on desktop?

Firefox’ tabs are so darn bad tho. It really bothers me I can’t just drag them around

WHOOOOOO

I use centimeters, and meters. The us can go sit in a corner and contemplate their failure in feet and inches

Someone didn’t actually read the article, dang op. You can do better.

It’s not that the power plant depended on the weather, but rather that the river life depended on not being boiled alive. Just like a coal or gas power plant, water is needed for cooling, which means the waste heats ends up in a nearby river.

But unlike coal or gas, nuclear doesn’t also produce a tonne of carbon dioxide. And oddly enough, a coal power plant would be more radioactive than a nuclear plant.

Same here in the Netherlands, sucks to be American I guess :p

Ye I expect so, I don’t like the way this author just doesn’t bother explaining her points. She just states that she disagrees and says they should be left to their own rules.

Which is probably fine, but that’s just lazy or she’s not mentioning the difference for another reason

She names Trump’s points explicitly, but doesn’t go beyond “the best practices of this and that institution”.

I can’t say they’re wrong, I expect a scientific institution to have some integrity to say the least. But either she’s too lazy to look them up, or she’s not quoting any for a different reason

If only there was some sort of governing organization that’s supposed to protect us from unfair labour practices and exploitation

Just going by this article I can’t quite tell whether either party has good intentions. Except for that the writer here does not

Roll you own “platinum standard” and see if he buys it :p

It’s easy to deny it’s built on stolen content and difficult to prove. And AI companies know this, and have gotten caught stealing shitty drawings from children and buying user data that should’ve been private

Nop, they’re just autistic and an a bad person. Although not related, those two can happen at the same time

It’s usatoday, to be fair

Weirdly common for neurovanillas not to develop some basic social skills and everyone around them just kinda accommodates them

He can be that stupid, if you’ve noticed :p

Screwed over is what they get