

A Pizza. It was in Milan. Directly in front of the cathedral. It tasted like a frozen pizza, and I was utterly disappointed.
A Pizza. It was in Milan. Directly in front of the cathedral. It tasted like a frozen pizza, and I was utterly disappointed.
Saitenbacher Müsli. They have obnoxious radio ads in Germany.
Single as I would die immediately at 100°C
I am not the messias!
Altijd. Ich aime this mucho.
Not for me (34m). I like having my niblings around and play with them, but I like it even more to give them back into their parents care after half an hour. I simply could not stand to be responsible for another human being and devoting almost every minute of my life to them for several years, and taking the appropriate measures to ensure I will not father a child was the best decision in my life.
So, like the Kantian categorical imperative?
Report it to the Ordnungsamt if you have the Licensen Plate
So in short, I defended what I loved and I know I would take my fiancee over them any day of any week.
A great basis for a relationship. All the best for your marriage and have a great wedding!
No, no and no. I just have no desire, and I find my life so much easier without them. I have nieces and nephews and children of friends who I love and am happy to engage with, but also happy that I am not responsible for them.
I think you have some misconceptions about psychology in general. E.G. you name Stanford Prison, and then explain that it has not been replicated. The act of trying (and failing) to replicate those results is psychological research, and then you reference this research as argument against psychology. Also, you seem to suggest like psychology is deterministic (A happens to someone, so they react in way B), while it is a probabilistic science (if A happens to someone, the chance that they will react in way B increases by X% to Y% with a probability of 95%).
One comment on your example: The prisoner’s dilemma (the way I know it) is not a psychological, but a game theoretical concept and is usually applied with the assumption of rational actors a one-shot interaction, which means that it doesn’t apply to your situation with your friend.
In general, it seems that your disdain for psychology stems from laypersons’ broad and biased understanding of psychological concepts.
Disclaimer: I am not a psychologist.
Do you work at the Carnival?
I lived in New York! (Not really though, just quoting Britta from Community - in the first comment, too)
Baggel for Bagel.
Thanks, I’m a German native speaker myself - I tend to use je vs u in Dutch similar to the German du und Sie, but as the other replies indicate that seems to be a bit too formal in Dutch :)
Thank you, that’s definitely good to know!
Do you mean je vs u? Could you tell me more about which would be appopriate in settings like a police control, a shop or a campsite? I’m learning dutch but still trying to grasp those things :)
in the (translated) Words of Knorkator:
The world doesn’t need billionaires imagine how beautiful it would be without you! Empathy and reason instead of greed and scam fresh air, green forests, clean seas.
The world doesn’t need billionaires and we will even achieve this without guns: No, we won’t kill you and we won’t imprison you, on the opposite: you will be millionaires!
Gouda for sandwiches, but also Mozzarella or Feta to cook with it
Next time in Naples, go to da Michele!