Okay, my interpretation may be incorrect ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I get it, I really do. The plight of the people of Gaza is terrible.

But the current US administration is never going to do anything about that. Never. They’ll only make the suffering worse.

I think the “propaganda” accusation is in regards to OP posting endless divisive rhetoric against anyone going against the current US administration.

It doesn’t help Gaza to keep the current administration, and just because someone doesn’t mention Gaza doesn’t mean they don’t care about Gaza. Context matters.

Texas: not even once. Sorry Austin

So sad, and so predictable

“I didn’t think that the leopards would eat MY face!” - says person who voted for the Leopards Eating Faces party

There’s a difference between not wanting billionaires to exist and not wanting people to be able to be rich.

Billionaires ≠ rich, billionaire = too rich

The thing about EOs though is that some of them are clearly illegal, constitutionally.

Media needs to write about that more and what he “said” less

I feel you about them reporting on just the sheer amount of shit he “said”.

Like, today, he “said” the US will take over Gaza…no we fucking won’t.

Stick to what he “did”/“accomplished”, stop spewing out stories about whatever the fuck crazy shit he “said” today, I’m way too tired of it already

I mean, good for Nelly. After all, it is about to get quite hot in herr

I see what you did there

Shouldn’t the headline be “Republican said something terrible to get the media talking about her, and we’ve done exactly what she wanted”?

First, you have a tenuous grasp of words and language, at best, based on your assumptions and then your pitiful response when your false assumptions were called out as such. So please don’t try to lecture others on the subject. It is 100% your fault that you made bad assumptions, and the fact that you aren’t willing to own up to that proves that you don’t deserve a “sorry, let me try again” but instead a “hey dummy, why don’t you try again”.

Second. It’s not “apologist” to call out the Democrats as failures. You’re showing your tenuous grasp of language again. I hope that you asked for some books from Santa Claus this Christmas, because you are sorely in need of some education, kid

First, I didn’t say the Democrats didn’t support slavery for felons, I called out the fact that you think there’s only 2 sides. So, you know, maybe take a breath before making assumptions and responding next time

Seconably, there’s a huge political cost to amending the constitution. You think the political party that just lost to a convicted rapist and multi-felon has the kind of clout to amend such an obviously terrible thing when they’re too busy trying to prevent anyone younger than 70 years old from fighting against billionaires? GTFO with that!

Long story short: we know “one side” would do it if they had the power, but they don’t, because they suck up to the same billionaires the “other side” does…

“both” parties…sure

They specifically talk about this in the article. How is that misleading?

Middle East “crisis”? Isn’t Assad being gone…a good thing?

🤦

More like Dave Chappelle Roan, amirite? 😅