I personally think it’s more disturbing how the only time he can stay awake is when grown adults line up to praise him to trade their most creative sychophantic fantasies in for real world power points in the Republican party, but I guess whatever it takes.

Wonder how hard it would be to deaggregate his Google ad profile from his demographics and area. It was easy to do in DC

Wouldn’t someone they’re attempting to denaturalize be a valid target of that description?

Billion dollar contract for GeoGroup. They employ their prisoners for virtually no money, leaning on good behavior for better outcomes that will never come. There are some people who are only still there after lawful orders of removal because their “job” is considered too useful, such as translators. Slavery never left the US, it just got hidden behind bars.

Why would they be derailing talks if they were simply putting it off until the US feels the economic effects back home? They have already done enough damage to put US consumers on wait lists for gas. How would it benefit Iran to negotiate on pre-emptying of the reserves terms?

I feel like this well represents one of my first coding mistakes in VB, right before I started way overusing conversion calls

Jim Crow laws against working class next Delaware? Unironically the real great replacement theory is just rich fucks signing a stack of forms.

Media really stepping on their own dick with this title. Nobody cares about a guy who likes hunting being in the Democratic party, even a little. What they care about is common sense gun legislation, healthcare, skyrocketing price of living, and ruining the planet. All of these come back to corporate greed controlling policy.

They’re prolly gonna have to wear their uniform during the whole event. Otherwise the grift doesn’t work. Something something taking up smoking so you can have more breaks at work.

He’s probably not qualified to work in any other admin if he’s as braindead as Samuel. Likely not qualified to do much other than whatever sugar daddy company owner gives him a don’t touch anything job.

Utilizing maximum leverage over employers is a union’s job. It’s how we all get shit like the weekend. Public trust in government dies because priorities aren’t in alignment with the interests of the people. If their job can be done just as well without return from home then how does wasting their time, gas, and space on the road speak to good priorities?

Speaking from my own community, if the community knows who you are you’ve basically nearly won. One of our politicians started their career owning a real estate business where they posted their face on every billboard in the area. They were big with the center of commerce crew, but were* also antithetical to the views of a mostly young and highly educated and progressive city. They won anyways, because the opponent wasn’t already burned into the minds of everyone who drives around here.

I do like the idea of smaller meaning that you may actually know the person and have an opportunity to talk to them person to person, I just have a jaded view because of what I’ve seen happen with human fallacies controlling the results.

Sorry for the edit after your post. I think buying races isn’t harder when there’s more of them, but organizing for them might be. I’d be open to change on that opinion, but eventually wouldn’t you hit a point of diminishing budget for a small candidate that they can’t afford a single commercial whereas the corporate candidate could afford multiple?

Edit: Eventually the resolution of targeted ads starts to fail too relative to the district borders.

I’m not necessarily sold on the idea that reps of a given state should only be responsible for a very small subsection of people who are likely poorly informed. Just thinking of my own representative, who won against a progressive based entirely on name recognition rather than policy, it seems abundantly clear that money can easily touch all races whereas educated voters and advocacy may not exist in enough districts to be meaningful. Money can, and in quantities above the median income with ease.

After reading the article, I think there’s a inherent assumption that more means harder to gerrymander, but every republican gerrymandering recently released is computer generated. What would prevent them from arguing the districts of densely black areas thinly sliced from urban areas and then expanded out to suburbs is legal? When computer modeling and accurate voter information is supplied the possibilities of gerrymandering are not remotely hampered by increased resolution of the electoral maps. The districting will come to head with the notion that the same district even be contiguous. Do you trust SCOTUS to affirm it needs to be?

Probably a strong asterisk for “depending on what country.” Recitivism tends to be less desired in countries which outsource their prison systems either to other countries or corporations.

Doesn’t really need to be alleged when it was recorded by a prominent Israeli politician and posted to social media.

Local NAS

He sounds even dumber through text some how.

They’re competing with the couch, not just Republicans. Couch sitters basically always have higher standards of Democrats than they do of Republicans. In fact, the entire electorate and media infrastructure have higher standards for Democrats. It’s fine to disagree, but I feel like that’s just being purposely obtuse for why it’s not in the report. Ken Martin and Ken Martin’s “friend” fucked this up royally and even liberals are pointing that out. Why the cope?

Also couldn’t let this slip by either: Ken Martin commissioned the report, NOT his predecessors.

I would buy that it’s just an out of touch loser’s opinion, but what kinda screws that up for me is that they didn’t even discuss Biden’s age or* cognitive issues being a significant factor. Anyone alive and* paying attention during the time, even someone who only watched morning Joe, would have mentioned that.

Edit: phone typos