Hell, some women are attracted to boobs themselves, is it bad when they do it as well, or is it only bad when men are attracted to boobs?

I really like boobs too. But I don’t get distracted by them in normal non-sexual situations. The issue isn’t being attracted, it is the gaze.

I think you’re kind of being dismissive of what that commenter is saying. It is really uncomfortable being looked at like that.

Hey I’m not trying to tell you it isn’t normal to be attracted to people, lord knows I’d be a hypocrite. It just seems like you’re describing a learned behavior associated with the sphere of attraction that might make women uncomfortable. I know one of the replies to your comments mentioned being so uncomfortable by men doing it that they thought about getting a cosmetic mastectomy.

You don’t have to be good at drawing actually! The point of that sort of stuff (drawing people, still life, etc) is to develop drawing skills.

There are straight up indexes of photos of peoples breasts not presented sexually, if medical stuff squicks you out.

I’m just trying to suggest things because it seems like what you’re describing might make it harder to interact with women as people and might make women uncomfortable, and if that is something you want to fix there are avenues for doing that.

It isn’t that hard though. Go to a nudist retreat or beach, practice figure drawing (there are plenty of free online figure drawing resources), look at medical indexes, watch medical documentaries, just off the top of my head.

Actually sexualization- as opposed to attraction- to breasts isn’t natural, which is wild. There are plenty of cultures where breasts aren’t sexualized, especially near the equator in some traditional cultures where women go topless.

Also as a lesbian in the US who definitely has internalized sexualizing boobs, I don’t find it at all distracting when someone isn’t wearing a bra. Maybe it is just that I see boobs in non-sexual contexts so it only is sexualized within a sexual context? That might be useful if you’re interested in unlearning this habit.

A better analogy would be handing magazines to a mass shooter whenever he ran out of ammo

what they then choose to do with it is on them, not us.

Why do you believe this? Don’t people have a responsibility to not give weapons to people knowing they will be used for genocide?

Also, us? Are you part of the Biden admin?

Yeah didn’t he call for the creation of “greater israel” in the region or something?

What do you call giving weapons with the knowledge that they will be used for genocide?

Does the recipient obviously lying “oh they’ll just be used for defense” while they continue to commit genocide with previous shipments of weapons give the democrats plausible deniability in your book?

The Nazis couldn’t have done the holocaust without IBM, yeah.

Yes, it is their fault the nazis viewed them as subhuman and exterminated them in a way they didn’t do with the conquered French. /s

Have you actually studied ww2? France fell in weeks. So yeah the Soviets did better.

Yes, I think our democratic processes could be better in many countries.

No, we do not have democracy. We have bourgeois democracy that cannot be reformed into democracy.

What is bourgeois democracy?: https://www.leftvoice.org/bourgeois-democracy-what-do-marxists-mean-by-that-term/

If you are skeptical of the inability to reform bourgeois democracy I would do some reading on Allende and Chile.

And you think the numerically inferior soviet troops -who did better than the larger more mechanized and better equipped French and British troops- while also fighting a larger better equipped force demonstrates…

The point of this exercise is for you to find the numbers and experience a moment of self reflection. What I think of the credibility of the numbers doesn’t matter.

You won’t though. One has to wonder why?

No, capitalism vs socialism is; who owns the means of production, the capitalist class or the working class?

Okay, then go find other sources for these numbers:

• Number of axis troops invading France

• Number of French and British commonwealth troops during the initial defense of France

• Number of axis troops invading the Soviet Union

• Number of Soviet troops during the initial defense of the Soviet Union

Do you think your bourgeois democracy is actually democratic? If you are for democracy you’d be a socialist.

Literally just look up the numbers on Wikipedia(or whatever other center-right source you consider credible) and stop embarrassing yourself.

Remind me how many French and British troops were bypassed and encircled during the invasion of France?

Remember that the combined forces in France were much larger and more mechanized than the soviet army during barbarossa, and were invaded by less troops