A dead martyr is more useful than a live one, sometimes

Because when they say “democratise”, they actually mean “privatise everything and start selling out to international financial capital”. Don’t forget: nazis were a tool of the bourgeoisie to clamp down on proletariat and ensure private profits

And now BBC is spamming articles about “opposition leader dying in arctic prison”

Don’t get your hopes up

Oh so that’s why they have “hex” in the name

It still ends with NATO breathing right down Russia’s neck

The question is - what are they going to do about it?

Sounds like bullshit, no offense

Didn’t the Catholic church support Nazis?

So what’s the solution here? Should everyone around the globe just go vegan?

but they do not treat communist as people

If Ukraine is any indication, there seems to be a serious push to associate USSR with Russia specifically - Soviet Ukraine is treated as being occupied and essentialy collaborationist. With that in mind, I am not sure Duda or any of his draw any distinction between treating communists as non-human (which is fucked up by itself) and treating Russians as non-human (gee, where’d we heard that one before).

He said that soviets were bringing “bolshevism, wilderness, cruelty, rape, death, unimaginable bestiality”

Wewlad. But somehow that isn’t racism as far as “international community” is concerned.

I would argue that there are things that should be classified as criminal, even for a criminal endeavour like war - just look at things imperial Japan did in China, for example.

That said, people seem to not know (and not want to know) actual definitions for the term and just throw it out at whatever the “bad guys” are doing. Or what they think they are doing, like that story about how “Russian spies are marking residential buildings for missile strikes”. Or the one about “Russian tank purposefully running over a car”. All those stories dilute the meaning of the term and cheapen the suffering.