UniversalBasicJustice

I advise studying the Killdozer event to prepare for your montage!

This way we can downvote each schizoposting idea rather than limit ourselves to a single “wtf?” downvote.

My Master’s degree, if not a PhD, preferably in Sweden or at least the EU. Space was my original aspiration but now I’m thinking renewable energy or a similar engineering field with an eye toward helping adapt to climate change.

You can and will do it.

Narcolepsy sleep test in less than a month 😵‍💫

I fucking hate Musk but in what world is SpaceX unprofitable? If you’re talking about xAI then I’ll agree with you, but with the access to space and starlink/starshield wrapped up in it SpaceX is positioned as the most likely of the AI companies to receive a government bailout when the balloon pops.

Agreed, accuracy and sources are important!

https://github.com/immich-app/immich/discussions/23176

FUTO has demonstrated other sketchy behavior. The relevant comments were collapsed when I opened the page FWIW.

Also, platforming Yarvin alone is enough for me to avoid FUTO. Everyone is free to draw their line in the sand where they will.

I edited my previous comment from “FUTO is Curtis Yarvin” to “FUTO is associated with Curtis Yarvin” to be more precise.

https://drewdevault.com/blog/Whats-up-with-FUTO/

FUTO is associated with Curtis Yarvin

I was thinking ayahuasca without a shaman.

Classic Killdozer

My split is currently 10% traditional “retirement target date” 20% small cap US and 70% International Index. All Vanguard. There are also emerging market and more granular international funds. Talk to your servicer.

Have you considered he may be a relatively well-known figure in this space, thus generating additional interest that a less-prolific user may not? Due to the rarity of tagging a user in the first place you bring further attention when tagging anyone in any comment regardless of their popularity.

When that tag involves accusations of pedophile apologia or Zionist-washing without providing evidence it will receive negative attention regardless of the user’s popularity.

Your suspicions regarding paid engagement ignores the rational explanation that he is simply a recognizable name. Those suspicions are further undercut by tagging him and accusing him of reprehensible behavior. You personally have increased engagement with your actions.

Please, by all means, provide us with evidence that Pug abuses his banhammer. Mod logs aren’t hidden. If his actions are scummy or inappropriate for his position then prove it. Regardless of his popularity you would be doing a favor for the entire fediverse in doing so.

I’m staunchly anti-genAI but consider other applications of traditional machine-learning less problematic. A purely local model for photo categorization seems, in theory, less objectionable to me. I’m sure models exist already but I’m purposefully out of the loop. Any suggestions for models I could look into? And just how much compute would something like that require?

What’s the context with Pug?

Allegedly.

You aren’t ‘taking’ anything. You’ve already paid for it.

Medical professionals are supposed to do no harm. It sounds to me like they did their job. Did they hurt him? Undoubtedly. They also gave him another year of life at minimum, judicially speaking.

Without evidence to the contrary I’m going to believe this was the work of malicious compliance.