ZoDoneRightNow

Now that you’ve mentioned calendar I’m guessing it is the one with 31 on it? Honestly didn’t know what it was at first glance, thought it was maybe something to do with window management as it sorta looks like a browser window or something. Still don’t know how it is supposed to look like a calendar other than it having a 31 on it

Design brief: Make them look like the google suite but purple. The harder it is to work out what the app does from the logo, the better.

I know one family that did this, but yeh, far from common

Don’t have much sympathy for this person but no company has any more right to a domain name than any of us and this sets a scary precedence.

ZoDoneRightNow = 10+1 + 2+1+1+1 + 1+1+2+4+1 + 1+1+4 = 11 + 5 + 9 + 6 = 31

Would you upload your government ID just to access the web? Would you be content knowing that a leak at a social media company could lead to your identity being stolen just because your government wants to keep under 16s off of mainstream social media. Would you be happy with your child using 4chan because they are banned from using safer social media websites? I personally know several people who would not be around today if online safe spaces didn’t exist to give them an escape from bullying, queerphobia or domestic violence. I can understand why someone might agree with the sentiment “people under 16 shouldn’t be on social media”, but I cannot understand why someone would be okay with the specifics of this legislation. People are going to have their lives ruined because of this new law and it doesn’t even succeed in what it sets out to do (nominally) in the first place. The true reason for this bill is not to “protect children from radicalisation”, but to drive viewer/readership of Murdoch media, if it were about protecting children from radicalisation and bullying, why are the worst of these social media sites not included in the ban?

But also not because it was black friday

A 2026 diary

A 2026 diary

Paper human chain or paper people chain

Paper human chain or paper people chain

Yeh, disagreeing with someone about how that person wants to be referred to is such a normal and polite thing to do /s

Anyone can see votes. They are public. You’ve been upvoted by [email protected] and [email protected]

Nice misgendering. Very mature of you. I’ll be sure not to complain about it so I don’t get a circlejerk thread of my own.

Yeh, people like you are creating circle-jerk threads to shit on people who ask politely not to call them things they don’t want to be called.

It wasn’t a fine though. They were ordered to pay the catering companies for damages and lost revenue, doesn’t say anything about a fine.

Archive link: https://archive.is/elu4M

Archive link: https://archive.is/elu4M

There is no ‘M’ or ‘O’ in the statement “six percent of fifty” There also is no exponentiation so I have no idea what you are on about

It is rhyming slang