• 0 Posts
  • 35 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle





  • They’re not issues so much as nit-picks.

    On the now playing screen, I try to swipe the album image to skip (like Spotify) but it doesn’t. Yes, the skip button is right there, but when driving it’s needlessly distracting to have to find the small button.

    There’s no obvious way to see your play history when it’s on auto play or radio.

    You can start a station from a single song, and you can add song variety to a single-song station, and you can let a playlist end and it will autoplay songs, but you can’t create a station from a playlist directly. These seem like the same function but are treated differently.

    You can ‘collect’ or ‘👍’ a song from radio/autoplay, and it’s implied that it influences the station to do the latter, but all the 👍 songs go to their own playlist and sometimes a ‘songs you liked from this station’ playlist separate from the station and sometimes in the station page. It can unintuitive.

    There’s no API so there’s no way for TuneMyMusic to import my playlists from Spotify.

    Adding a song to a playlist often fails the first time, I can mash it but it doesn’t go, but if I back out and add it again it works.

    Some of these can be chalked up to user error, I haven’t gotten used to the paradigm change, but the app still feels rigid and “less polished”. Like I said, nitpicks.










  • If your argument is that “AI is just a tool and Capitalism is the real boogeyman, again” then I absolutely agree with you.

    My gripe is that openAI and Meta are clearly scraping from copyrighted media but because of the scale of the scraping it’s not ‘stealing’ in the traditional sense. While we’re bickering about the semantics of legality, this tool is being weaponised to further wealth inequality.

    And to be clear, I’ve been referencing the AI companies and movie studios, not the technology itself.



  • _g_be@lemmy.worldtoCurated Tumblr@sh.itjust.workson AI art, copyright and theft
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    But we’re AI users going to pay?

    In your head is AI being used solely by common people for fun little prompts? If you build this machine that replaces the artist, corporations can and will use it that way.

    Big movie studios will use it to generate parts (and eventually all) of a movie. They can use this as leverage to pay the artists less and hire fewer of them. Animators, actors, voice actors.

    you want the rich and powerful to stop pirating and freebooting artist’s work, maybe the first step is to ban that (or rather, enforce it) rather than a technology two steps removed?

    If a movie studio pirated work and used it in a film, that’s against copyright and we could sue them under current law.
    But if they are paying openAI for a service, and it uses copyrighted material, since openAI did the stealing and not the studio then it’s not clear if we can sue the studio.

    Logically we would pursue openAI then, but you’re arguing that we shouldn’t because it’s “two steps removed”.

    Seems like it’s being argued that because of the layer of abstraction that is created when large quantities of media is used, rather than an individual’s work, that it’s suddenly a victimless crime. That because what’s being done is not currently illegal it must not be immoral either.