Ooh I know: it means “smart enough to make Eliezer Yudkowsky think it’s smarter than he is.”

Well, you could just go back to sending stuff by fax machine forever, but then instead of even using the fax machine to sync patient data just make the patients fill out their own entire medical history from scratch every time they go to a different doctor and take their word for it.

TERFs are as feminist as Nazis are socialist and North Korea is democratic. It’s in the acronym; that’s it.

That’s a lot of three-syllable words.

It can be censored for not giving sufficiently MAGAfied answers or acknowledging the existence of things fascists want memory-holed.

It can’t be sued for devouring, assimilating and plagiarizing all copyrighted media ever created.

Two very different sorts of regulation.

It’s nothing about trust issues- privacy is just a foreign concept to that generation. It was dead and gone before they were born. They take for granted that eveyone has their phone on them at all times and is never unreachable, so knowing where all your friends are is just a matter of convenience.

That’s the current Fox News whataboutist talking point. Did you even read the article?

Mildly concerning.

I’m amused by the 14 oxygen-wasting NPCs who are in this picture and didn’t like it.

Could be a as simple as:

Not chicken out on those tariffs that [absolutely nobody actually believes are] going into effect in 14 days.

And if that hasn’t fucked shit up good enough in a month, he could move on to plan B:

Not chicken out on his “50 days for Russia to end the Ukraine war” ultimatum.

Some nazi, attempting humor, on Fox.

Nothing more there to ‘get’. It is just as stupid and awful as it initially appears.

deleted by creator

I’m expecting it to happen when the AI bubble pops.

Ooh, maybe now it can siphon off all those “Abundance Agenda” fucknuggets from the dregs of the Democratic Party. Take Bloomberg too, while you’re at it.

I mean, I guess they could have slammed her. But you have to work your way up to a slam. If slamming is your opening move, where do you go from there?

Being a lifelong pessimist, I am getting really tired of article headlines telling me that [x] is worse than I think.

Does anyone even believe these stupid tariff announcements anymore? How much more likely is it that he cancels them last minute, or drops them after less than a week, or delays them for another 90 days? He has less than zero credibility.

This is sadly the correct answer. Performative legislation for Alex Jones droolers.

The real thing it actually does ‘ban’ in practice, is where after having done absolutely nothing about CO2 emissions, we would turn the sky white forever to keep the temperature from going to +3.5°C to +10°C so that it’s still possible to grow some crops outdoors somewhere and everybody doesn’t die. That’s still a couple of decades in the future; China and Australia will probably agree to do it and whatever’s left of the US by then will have no say in the matter.