• 3 Posts
  • 54 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 19th, 2024

help-circle


  • The concept makes a lot of sense and was really really cool.

    I saw a playthrough and I had 3-4 problems:

    • everyone seems to be better at colonizing on their own, separate from the home base, whose literal only purpose is to colonize.
    • (mechanically the whole colonization thing is trivialized by mary sue story progression and deus ex machina devices)
    • all the new aliens are once again roughly 2m tall humanoids
    • the ending felt… very “we need setpieces” and “absolutely make it a parade of every minor character we talked to”

    ME1 even had Rachni, as non-humanoid npcs, could have something like that…

    (And obviously most parts of the art departments did their job well. Hilarious but not game breaking bugs were the exception to the rule. It’s 99% a direction and writing problem.)



  • Hard to say.

    Sounds like the alternatives are to suck it up, leave the country for somewhere that isn’t the case yet, stop using the internet…

    There definitely is a line where requiring nonsense is more effort than it is worth. That line has already definitely been crossed by “news media”. The quality of articles and interviews is so abysmal, that any hear say you get over three rebounds over social media is still somehow equal to the original bad source.

    Social media is on the edge. I don’t expect to have a serious discussion on facebook or twitter, that’s why I don’t go there. If it’s easier to hang out in a bar near a library to hope someone worth talking to walks in or something like that. That will be the thing to do.

    And also, that line will probably just never be actually crossed for internet platforms like amazon or alibaba. Shipping and ordering things online is absurdly convenient compared to go to physical locations and them needing to have the thing stocked, etc…

    Most of (open source) software is already built in a way that could be taken offline completely. Internet is just a fast and easy delivery mechanism, but carrying USB sticks is extremely viable for getting code from A to B

    And for entertainment, I can honestly just go back to reading books. It’s not the total information super highway, but it would be something.






  • I agree, but they aren’t.

    I am specifically saying this, because my democratic country has laws that would also cover these things the letter mentions and would also deem them wrong. The people normally charged with upholding that law, are just dumb, “not from the internet” and overworked with other stuff.

    Please check what laws your country has around the topic of glorification of crime and violence.

    We also don’t know what the payment processors told itch and steam.

    Itch and steam are doing what they are doing as a blanket move, to create a situation where they can stay in business for now and deal with the problem at all.

    My bet would be that they “allowed nsfw stuff”, turned a blind eye, and now suddenly noticed they actually have a really big legal problem, with actual laws and the fact that it was an NGO and not an official legal institution that started this, was dumb luck and now they mostly need time and cover their own arse.


    And I fully support the opinion that it shouldn’t be the payment processors forcing these sorts of things. But reality is messy and if this was the path of least resistance to get something done, such is life.



  • assuming the handler function is encrypted to match.

    Yeah, this is the thing I’m doubting / don’t understand how that would work.

    E.g. A* / navigation problems.

    You send private start and goal points.

    Either the stuff is truly private, then the program can’t read it.

    Or the program can read it, but then the owner of the machine the program runs on can just read it from memory.

    It doesn’t matter if it says “45124x5234234fgasdgf” or “Paris”, because the program state will identify that. Even if you encrypt the entire location database (with stuff that’s then fully known to the server) and it will still look up “45124x5234234fgasdgf” and the server can trivially decrypt that.

    check out apple’s homomorphic encryption page

    Interesting, but I’m more leaning on “they have a vested interest to lie about this” rather than “surely this is correctly working tech that keeps me safe”. Like Amazons “AI supermarket” that was just a bunch of indians doing video surveillance.

    And their explanation makes the same amount of sense as the blog post. I have no doubt that it can work for simple commutative math operations, over “smooth” domains. Where my doubt comes in is functions where the encryption would cause the operation to take place outside of the domain bounds.

    How does an encrypted asin or acos work?


    Anyway, thanks for the answer, I was recently impressed by GNU Taler, which also did something cryptographic stuff I didn’t think was possible. So I’m not saying this is heresy and can’t be done and trying to say it will work is forbidden, I just don’t think the explanations so far are detailed enough.


  • I don’t believe this will work? I would have to see an actually working example though. With actual data, not matrix vector multiplications those are trivial.

    Doing math on garbled numbers and then reverse garbling it? Easy. Doing text parsing on garbled text? Probably impossible, but I’d loveto be proven wrong. I also think you have to reveal what kind of functions you want used?

    The homomorphism in category theory is often shown by a commutative diagram, where you can go from a point to another by interchanging the order of operations. In the below diagram for FHE, you can go from (a, b) to E(a*b) in two separate ways.

    Even in math this doesn’t work for all problems.