This is the way.

Deleted

Ok, but what is it about?

This sounds like something a utahraptor would say…

Pedantic: You mean Y-axis, right? Technically, neither start at zero but I think you meant Y based on context.

IIRC, if someone in the line of succession is ineligible (underage, non-native citizen, already been president for too many years, etc), then they are skipped over.

Neither of these are going to happen.

If you have options where you live, you may want to look for a better grocery store. Kroger is not known for supporting their employees.

My lord? Yes? My lord? Yes? Let’s get digging! Whoa! What now?

• Hidden song made from sound effects in Lords of the Realm II

Yes, but also: Everything the government does costs money because someone has to make sure it’s being done. This stupid SAVE thing would have cost money to enforce and, therefore, it could be argued that it is related to the budget. That’s not a a very good argument, but it’s enough to slow down the process while they argue over it.

Are you saying that two of the most powerful financial institutions in the world would bribe the politician who does what the billionires want and has explicitly requested bribes in the past? Surely you’re not serious.

According to Snopes and PolitiFact, you were looking at a fabricated list of Trump’s victims and settlements to make legal issues go away. I have very little doubt victims exist but this list of names and dollars is not based on fact.

It may just be a difference in use case. I don’t use navigation apps for my daily and local trips. I use navigation when I’m going to be driving hundreds of miles to a new location and don’t already know how to get there.

If your primary goal is finding out how to get from A to B and not caring about the very fastest way to get from A to B right now, then you don’t need traffic data.

This is usually a good point. However, from my reading of just the snippet and some quotes others posted (and without reading the article myself because I am lazy), it may be that they are prohobiting the inclusion of preferred pronouns. If that’s accurate, then it means they are refining their bigotry to be more precise.