- 0 Posts
- 23 Comments
miz@lemmygrad.mlto GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml•The Hudson Institute has pivoted to writing fiction: "China after Communism"7·15 days agoHeLLo, aNd wELcOmE tO “ThE DrAgOn RiSeS”
WE care for veterans and children
About 19% of U.S. children (13.4 million kids) lacked reliable access to adequate food in 2022.
miz@lemmygrad.mltoGeopolitics@lemmygrad.ml•Why we should worry about nuclear weapons again8·2 months agomy guess before clicking: whining about the US losing hegemony
miz@lemmygrad.mltoGeopolitics@lemmygrad.ml•India-Pakistan conflict and social chauvinism3·3 months agoimo, your included text was better because it dropped the bold. thank you
miz@lemmygrad.mltoGeopolitics@lemmygrad.ml•India-Pakistan conflict and social chauvinism4·3 months agothe overuse of bolded phrases in the original article makes it harder to read
“mano a mano” means “hand to hand”. I think Xi could take him easily
miz@lemmygrad.mltoGeopolitics@lemmygrad.ml•Fyodor Lukyanov: Here’s what Trump really wants from his trade war3·4 months agonobody knows what’s inside the orange’s peel
we are refederated as of today
miz@lemmygrad.mlto World News@lemmygrad.ml•Xinjiang residents to sue BBC over fake news on region22·5 months agodrop Zenz into Gaza so he can do some learning about what genocide is like
miz@lemmygrad.mlto GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml•General Discussion Thread - Juche 114, Week 111·5 months agoremoving this kind of watermark should be trivial now with generative so-called AI, right
miz@lemmygrad.mlto GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml•Before 1959 the vast majority of Tibetans were subjected to slavery and serfdom, a major issue that is chronically ignored in any popular assessment of Chinese-Tibetan history.13·5 months agoLet us look at a specific example. A claim like “[Free Tibet]” is simply unreal to most Westerners, close to pure gibberish. The words really refer to existing entities and geographies, but Westerners aren’t familiar with them. The actual content of the utterance as it spills out is no more complex or nuanced than “China Bad,” and the elementary mistakes people make when they write out statements of “solidarity” make that much clear. This is not a complaint that these people have not studied China enough — there’s no reason to expect them to study China, and retrospectively I think to some extent it was a mistake to personally have spent so much time trying to teach them. It’s instead an acknowledgment that they are eagerly wielding the accusation like a club, that they are in reality unconcerned with its truth-content, because it serves a social purpose.
What is this social purpose? Westerners want to believe that other places are worse off,
miz@lemmygrad.mlto GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml•Good resources/explanations of pre-capitalist class society? (Especially on the transition between these societies as compared to the transition from capitalism to socialism)4·5 months agoif you put the soviet textbook on a thumb drive and take it to a print shop you can just print it out
miz@lemmygrad.mlto GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml•Responding to a response to my take on Xinjiang11·5 months agobtw it’s just shy of 30,000 miles now
Whether this author knew but ignored the truth that capitalism kills ten million every year, or whether they had no idea, it makes no difference: the lasting impression is that they are an empty-headed piece of shit.