Sure but we’re talking about people who got laid of, they’re not getting a salary anyway. Unless starting a business gets rid of unemployment benefits I guess? But you can hold of on officially forming the business until you have some clients. I’m not saying it’d be easy, but I think it’s better than being unemployed
Tbf, unless there’s some massive capital expense that I’m not thinking about, you don’t really need any capital for doing software related work besides a computer, which most people already have anyway and maybe some office space. Software is about as capital lite as an industry can be, so if making a workers co-op under capitalism is going to work in any industry, it would be software.
The global south (and the global north) must stop breeding non-human animals for food because it’s a barbaric thing to do. What a bizarre comment. People from the global south are not infallible and people from the global north are not always wrong. Do you also think homophobic racists from the global south are beyond criticism? That’s ignoring the fact that the country with the most vegans is India, so framing veganism as some kind of western thing is doubly silly.
Removed by mod
I read the whole previous thread before commenting. No, they weren’t talking about a sanctuary, they were talking about an aquarium that uses non-human animals to make money. That’s the whole thing that (justifiably) pissed of Eiren. Calling it a sanctuary is white-washing. Like how people will white-wash native schools. Once again, the only reason you think my comparisons are ridiculous are because of your fundamentally reactionary and unjustifiable belief that non-human animals are objects to used for human pleasure, to be looked at for entertainment or murdered to make a meal slightly tastier.
That’s a ridiculous argument to make on an instance that frequently calls for death to various reactionaries. Your position on this fundamentally comes down to your own reactionary position on non-human animals, in seeing thinking, feeling, independent beings as the same as or little better than objects. Eiren’s anger was fully justified at someone who was advocating for a concentration camp.
Would you ban someone who insulted a reactionary that said, for example, that Native American reservations were a good thing and that the schools native children were sent to were a ‘charity’ that helped them by giving them an education? I’m sure you wouldn’t ban someone for insulting a reactionary like that. You’d rather ban the reactionary. You’d understand why someone was angry at a reactionary who said that. That you take the opposite approach here is no fault of Eiren’s, but rather your reactionary beliefs.
If you think that that’s an unfair thing to say, or that it’s ridiculous to compare humans and non-human animals, once again this attitude just stems from your own reactionary position. Humans are animals, there’s no reason not to compare them. Non-human animals are capable of feeling emotions like fear, pain, suffering, stress and also joy, happiness, bonds etc. They don’t want to die. They don’t want to be caged. They don’t want to be raped. They don’t want their children ripped away from them shortly after they’re born. These are all object scientific facts. There is no reason not to consider non-human animals to be people and to treat them with the dignity that that entails.
Yeah, tech peaked in 1991 with the creation of vim. It’s been mostly downhill since then
:D You are a_cute_kernel_panic
It cannot. To begin with, having one rich fuck have their voice be amplified to a thousand or a hundred thousand times that of the average person, merely because their wealth allows them to buy and therefore control media, is obviously not democratic.