

no offense, but “i work in the actual world” comes off rudely dismissive, and possibly a bit narrow minded. like, how did saying that help support your argument at all, and why assume others dont exist irl?
take music and dans to druq


no offense, but “i work in the actual world” comes off rudely dismissive, and possibly a bit narrow minded. like, how did saying that help support your argument at all, and why assume others dont exist irl?


ah ok. thanks


thanks for the encouragement! so far what ive seen matches what youve said.


to be fair, theres still a lot of really good info on there, by the matter of sheer volume alone. i learned a lot about linux for instance, from reddit the last couple years. Sadly lemmy doesnt yet have the volume that would have been able to foster the same amount of learning for me. heres to hoping lemmy grows faster by the day :)


my reason-less ban feels less bad every day


i dont understand why this is a conversation. shouldnt we just have the option to turn it on and off?


check out Ly, its default is a black screen https://github.com/fairyglade/ly


incredibly unhelpful


trickles down from the base kde packages. this is simple.
it appears they may not understand rolling release, or proper grammar to describe the situation, but theres an actual answer to their question, which is anything but “not at all”.


they would still be totally wrong. it will be available for new installs the moment kde adds it to the plasma packages. their comment makes zero sense.


??? are you being serious? obviously fedorah isnt arch.
anyway, Cachy will have it the second KDE adds it to the plasma / kde-applications packages.


hey cheers for the message.
i dont think your english was really bad. perhaps more that there was a slightly unusual grammar employed and because english itself is so messy and confusing, that i misunderstood. also, my english language abilities arent fantastic or normal anyway, even though its my fist language.
in english we also say that people “developed” an illness, its more about exact tense. So “has been developed” just sounded a bit awkward and made me think you meant the condition itself, and not the study of it.
anyway long story short, english itself sucks and is quite prone to misunderstandings. thanks for conversing in good faith. :)


there is and i also think there should be.
but i would never use one or recommend doing so.


No hablo español. Perdona que me molestara el problema gramatical. No era mi intención ser ofensivo de ninguna manera.
The thing is that “been developed” strongly implies that there was an active and intentional developing (inventing) of it. Sadly there are many people that do pose such questions, purposely framed in that manner. So I suppose i reacted based on a misunderstanding of that meaning. Cheers and be well :)


sadly i was forced to go to a number of them.
here, look for the chart breakdown regarding age and religiousness. good day. https://www.theglobalstatistics.com/religion-in-us-statistics/


“been developed”? *facepalm


lol … who do you think religious congregations are comprised of?


im new here bc my reddit account got banned for no reason as well. its really a shame. 6 years of info and notekeeping built up and then just stolen from me with no explanation at all.


This only makes the most sense. What other group has proven to be easier to scam? None, I’d imagine.
hope you have a better day tomorrow.