Lossy compression with no internal mechanism for detecting information corruption.

Affordable cost of living is a communist plot to destroy America

Because Iran isn’t going to challenge them in the US courts but the ICJ/ICC (if at all)

The bigots are going to vote for the biggest bigot regardless.

And the execs that made thr decision to fire in the first place will be punished by giving them bonuses.

It’s wild how we cater to the feelings of such voters while telling leftists they need to vote blue no matter who to save democracy. Where is that messaging for the xenophobes?

For the uninitiated: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/22/albania-protests-jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-resort-sazan-island-anger-government

To be fair, having a cross as your religious symbol tends to attract a death cult

“yeah there’s a new giant structure and there’s a new persistent and pervasive sound in the region that both appeared around the same time, but there’s no data connecting the two. It could just be the sound of my own ego”

IDK, cobol programmers still do well these days

Right on time for the markets to close

The description that the LLM did it on its own is subjective at best. I’ll just leave it at that. Have a good one

Without securing a popular mandate through an election? People are tired of elites rewriting the rules, how exactly is a vanguard going to be viewed as legitimate?

It’s not “bested” by the LLM though, a mathematician used the LLM as a tool to disprove a conjecture. Subtract the mathematicians from the process and the LLM would not have successfully completed the task. It would be more accurate to say a mathematician with an LLM was able to best a mathematician who did not have an LLM. Which is cool, but we don’t need to pretend the LLM is not a tool but something that “understands” math like a mathematician

You are the one collapsing tool use into a binary when there are varying degrees of competency and hand holding.

So why are you allergic to people talking about the quality of the tools in regards to capability?

How are you able to understand it’s capability without understanding what tools it is capable of manipulating to effect?

If you are not interested in how it completes the task then you are not an authority on how it works.

It’s relevant to what the parent was saying about LLMs. The success of the LLM in using mathematical tools does not contradict what they were saying. To then accuse them of lying because of a misunderstanding is… bad form.

Aren’t you the least bit curious what tools they gave the LLM and how the LLM used those tools? It’s like back in math class you are asked to solve a quadratic formula but you forgot how. So you use the calculator to try different numbers and the calculator is telling you if you are getting closer. Sure I got the right answer, but it’s hardly a testament to my math skills.