• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 month ago

      They both shoot rockets up in the sky. Our government could pay NASA to do it, or pay Space X.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 month ago

        NASA does not build it’s own rockets (anymore) they make the payloads. NASA will never make rockets as good/cheap as a companies like ULA and SpaceX.

        Take a look at the cluster fuck that is the SLS if you want an example

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            SpaceX can make the payloads, and they already do in the form of starlink.

            NASA carries out research/experiments something that spaceX probably doesn’t want to compete in since for the most part it does not pay

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            Uh, basically no.

            NASA has experiments to run, spaceX has no idea what science NASA is interested in doing. So having SpaceX make the payload doesn’t really make a lot of sense.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              So it sounds like they are codependent at this point. The bigger the nasa budget the better for space X.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 month ago

                I mean, that’s always been the case. That’s literally spaceX’s primary job, putting things in space for NASA. It’s the same for every launch provider in the US.