• Malfeasant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, and we can argue all day long about the morality of that specific way of raising animals for meat, but that doesn’t touch the question of whether or not it’s moral to eat meat in general.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        They just did.

        Eating meat = a neutral action that has no moral dilemma.

        How we produce meat products = a large and complex question that does pose an ethical/moral dilemma centered around methods of production.

        How is that so hard to understand?

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Because something is ‘natural’ does not mean that its moral.

          • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Never said it was moral. I said it was specifically amoral, as in “has nothing to do with your arbitrary sense of morality”. Try reading again.

            • quips@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I have trouble understanding how it could be amoral. Every time you eat meat you are making the choice to contribute to crimes than the holocaust? Who, without your contribution, would have a reduced capacity to commit suffering.