For instance, would you carry an iPhone the size of a shoebox if the rest of the space was a battery? Would you even be willing to carry one of the 80s phones that had a satchel?

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I think 7" phones are already pushing it, large phones are inconvenient for one-handed use. A shoebox-sized iPhone is just an iPad …

      • comador @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        I think you need only look back at the first mobile phones in the 1980s to find your answer to that.

        The first mobile phones and I mean prior to the first Nokias were undesirable at any price level due to consisting of overly heavy nicad batteries. As another mentioned: 1987 Lethal Weapon showed this issue. The only other niche market they could squeeze these stupid huge shoesized battery phones was in cars.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Well that’s just stupid. We could talk about a phone that’s twice as thick (essentially a powerbank glued to a standard smartphone), but there’s no point at all to go any bigger than that.