• fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Steve McDowell, chief analyst at NAND research, told The Register that VMware by Broadcom is “laser focused on high-revenue, high-margin business” and has priced its wares “just below the pain threshold for customers they care about.”

    Interesting way to word “we charged as much as we could possibly get away with”

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That analyst doesn’t work for Broadcom; it’s a third party. It could say, “they charged as much as they could possibly get away with” but I think “prices just below the pain threshold” is stronger language in a business setting.

  • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t understand diddly about the specifics of this article (I’m a member of the normie minority on this site who is neither working in IT, nor interested in the field), but I gotta say, I loved how it was structured and written. In a sea of AI generated crap, or simply parroting talking heads and calling it news, I found the way they laid out the article in two parts ("this is what happened, followed by “this is our subjective opinion on those events based on the wider context”) to be very refreshing.

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m convinced VMware started downhill when they dropped the hard windows client for the web based admin panel.

    They claimed it was for multi os compatibility… But they wrote the thing using ActiveX. For the youngsters, ActiveX shit was Internet Explorer and M.S. only. So the idiots wrote a UI that still only worked in Windows, and was now 5 times slower than the thick client.

    BTW, I run proxmox clusters in my garage. Its awesome

  • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This may be a silly question, but what are VMs generally used for in a corporate setting? Is it the same use case as docker?

    • Anubis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      In large scale computing, a server will have VERY powerful hardware. You can run multiple VMs on that one machine, giving a slice of that power to each VM so that it basically ends up with multiple individual computers running on one very powerful set of hardware instead of building a ton of individual.

      • ShunkW@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The other key feature being cost. A VDI terminal is much cheaper than actual PCs for employees. When I was working IT for a large company, we were able to get them in bulk for about $100 each. A PC cost us at least $800.