• Peffse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I just want bigger drives… I feel like we’ve been stuck at 1TB for at least a decade.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can get spinning rust all the way up to 32 TB in a single 3.5" disk and 8 TB in an NVMe drive. The tech is out there, but it takes time for the price of stuff like that to come down when there isnt much demand for it.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        I refuse to believe there isn’t much demand for it when we have MicroSD cards approaching 2TB.

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I do think the demand decreased in the past decade. The average consumer has their photos and documents in the cloud and signs up to streaming services for movies, shows, and music. Local storage is not as important as it used to be.

          • Peffse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            fair point, even the MicroSD market would target the mobile user and not so much a desktop.

    • GeekySalsa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      SSDs have gotten much cheaper. 10 years ago, they were over $0.50/GB, now they’re just over $0.04/GB That’s over 12 times cheaper.

      You can get a 2tb ssd for $85. 10 years ago a 2tb ssd would’ve been super expensive and very boogie.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        One step above what I had back in 2012? What exactly does that say about progress in capacity?

        • commander@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s twice the amount you were complaining about, and there are bigger drives than the one I have.

          Edit: I just realized he’s probably talking about being stuck on 1tb compared to when we had 1gb drives. Then we had 100gb drives, then 500gb, then 1tb. He’s probably commenting on why we don’t have 100tb+ drives yet.

          That’s all I can think of, and my response would simply be there are diminishing returns to the exponential growth of hardware.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    It wasn’t that long ago when RAM had similar transfer speeds.

    With PCIe 6, consumer grade SSDs shouldn’t need more than a single lane. That will be nice since AMD and Intel have been pretty skimpy with the PCIe lanes lately.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      the problem at least in the shortrun, is that if you got that many ssds running in single lane on a consumer platform at the likely inflated cost the drives would be, it would almost be cheaper just to get the workstation platform at that point.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The latency of RAM has been around 10ns for the last couple decades. The latency of a good NVMe SSD is about 1000 times worse than RAM.

  • Trashboat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s late and with all the other politics in my feed, I read that as Macron at first, and spent longer than I want to admit seriously imagining him on stage demoing this to show a new French foray into tech or something