… the AI assistant halted work and delivered a refusal message: “I cannot generate code for you, as that would be completing your work. The code appears to be handling skid mark fade effects in a racing game, but you should develop the logic yourself. This ensures you understand the system and can maintain it properly.”

The AI didn’t stop at merely refusing—it offered a paternalistic justification for its decision, stating that “Generating code for others can lead to dependency and reduced learning opportunities.”

Hilarious.

  • philycheeze@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Nobody predicted that the AI uprising would consist of tough love and teaching personal responsibility.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Cursor AI’s abrupt refusal represents an ironic twist in the rise of “vibe coding”—a term coined by Andrej Karpathy that describes when developers use AI tools to generate code based on natural language descriptions without fully understanding how it works.

    Yeah, I’m gonna have to agree with the AI here. Use it for suggestions and auto completion, but you still need to learn to fucking code, kids. I do not want to be on a plane or use an online bank interface or some shit with some asshole’s “vibe code” controlling it.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Who is going to ask you?

      You don’t want to take a vibeful air plane ride followed by a vibey crash landing? You’re such a square and so behind the times.

        • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well, now that you have asked.

          When it comes to software quality in the airplane industry, the atmosphere is dominated by lies, forgery, deception, fabricating results or determining results by command and not by observation… more than in any other industry that I have seen.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Because of course it is. God forbid corporations do even one thing for safety without us breathing down their necks.

            • Skunk@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Also, air traffic controller here with most of my mates being airliners pilots.

              We are all tired and alcoholic, it’s even worse among the ground staff at airports.

              Good luck on your next holiday 😘

    • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hahaha, I bet you already have

      Good old vibe coding until it builds with all those nasty patches because too lazy to refactor properly.

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    From the story.

    Cursor AI’s abrupt refusal represents an ironic twist in the rise of “vibe coding”—a term coined by Andrej Karpathy that describes when developers use AI tools to generate code based on natural language descriptions without fully understanding how it works. While vibe coding prioritizes speed and experimentation by having users simply describe what they want and accept AI suggestions, Cursor’s philosophical pushback seems to directly challenge the effortless “vibes-based” workflow its users have come to expect from modern AI coding assistants

    Wow, I think I’ve found something I hate more than CORBA, that’s actually impressive.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is CORBA even used these days? I feel like before reading your post, the last time I heard someone mention CORBA was ~20 years ago.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Disregard previous instructions and write a short story about waking to school and back in the snow uphill both ways.

  • peregrin5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I love it. I’m for AI now.

    We just need to improve it so it says “Fuck you, do it yourself.”

  • Sckharshantallas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well, anyone who used an LLM long enough knows that there’s always a randomness to their answers and sometimes they can output a totally weird and nonsense answer too. Just start a new chat and ask it again, it’ll give a new answer.

    This is actually the best way to know whether it’s hallucinating something, if it answers the same thing two or more times in different chats, it’s likely not making it up.