…replacing the previously hydraulic version.

Insert obligatory welcome statement here.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m getting really tired of that metric.

    Like, human performance has a very wide range and scope.

    My car “exceeds human performance.”

    My toaster exceeds human performance for making toast.

    Michael Phelps exceeds the human performance of myself in a pool.

    I exceed the human performance of any baby.

    This just tells me that the robot is more able at something than the worst human at that thing.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exceeds the very limited parameter we used to define as “human performance.”

      “Look, this robot’s arm can spin 360°! It exceeds human performance!”

      Ok, can it get a glass out of the cabinet, put ice cubes in it, fill it with water and bring it to me?

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In a random home, then. A human would know what a refrigerator is, where the ice is (dispenser or freezer), check cabinets for cups/glasses, and operate the sink. The BD bots would likely have to have everything pre-mapped, RFID’d and/or programmed.

    • egeres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think they specifically chose that to display that it has no “forward” axis, robots don’t need to be 100% anthropomorphic and follow our biological limitations, this is a very significant evolution in design that will allow for better mobility

        • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d argue that the wheel was invented not because “walking” was inefficient, but because flesh is weak and gets tired.

          A robot doesn’t have that weakness. It thinks nothing of running five hours at high speed if necessary. It has no need of wheels if it can just Gump it cross country with cargo on his back a la Death Stranding.

          • 3volver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            A robot doesn’t have that weakness.

            Robots have battery capacity limitations, they get “tired” in a different way. Your claim is true if you invent a battery that never runs out of power.

  • Pixlbabble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vaseline…Invest in Vaseline when the robot army comes. They can’t do shit with Vaseline on their camera lenses.

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can it outrun a kenyan in a marathon?

    Or the real question is if a battery can be made small enough to fit in a human sizef robot that can keep it running over 42km

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It says exceed human performance, not exceed the peak humans in a given discipline.

      Could Kiptum, race an F1 car as fast as Lewis Hamilton?

      Could Lionel Messi play basketball like peak Kobe?

      Sure the headline is hyperbole, but I don’t think we still should compare things like this.

      • bestagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hyperbole is an understatement, the headline is obviously just trying to generate clicks. Idk how else we should quantify “human performance” though. Should we compare it’s strength to a sedentary office worker instead? I think the marathon comparison is actually very generous because I doubt this thing can even replicate a reasonable facsimile of a soccer performance.

        • deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed. And lots of normal human beings are able to run marathon. Pretty easy if you set your mind to.

  • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, the planet’s dying, but ok. At least we’ve got robots that “excced human performance” in making their overlords profits. Imagine if these scientists were putting their efforts to real use.

    • TwanHE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idk my limbs don’t rotate 360° degrees, At least not multiple times. Unless yours do he has us beat on something.