• Asherah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m voting for Biden. Not happily, not even simply neutral on the matter. I hate that I have to vote for Biden.

    If AOC ran, I would not be even a little reluctant to vote for her. She reminds me of Bernie.

    • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m voting for the Biden administration. It’s more than just him. We need them all.

    • Justagamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am still hoping for the day to see someone of the same party convict a politician.

      If anyone has any cases I’d love a link!

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nixon resigned a day(?) after the impeachment articles were filed, because House Republicans told him that he didn’t have enough support in the party to not get convicted.

          • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You’re funny. There’s nothing even remotely pro-Russia in my post history nor have I made any effort to convince anyone not to vote.

            I just think our country is fucked because of… well, pretty much everything that’s happened over the course of my life.

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ah but then you’re admitting that impeachment has shown itself to be of little effect for a (current) moment. It’s still incumbent on us as a society to hold those responsible for this accountable. And worse, it looks like somehow the impeached person is a likely prospect to become president again.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wish there was a way to get rid of corrupt judges at the highest level that wasn’t a political process. I never understood the lifetime appointments anyway. It hasn’t done anything to keep them from being partisan.

    • Delusional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah here we have clearly obviously openly corrupt judges deciding on the biggest decisions of the land and nothing can seemingly be done to fix it. The system is broken.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      The American founders didn’t have good understanding of civil service type stuff back then. Coming from Britain there was a bureaucracy but if I’m remembering my history right it was mostly staffed by nobles who needed jobs and the overriding concern was that money should keep coming into the government. Especially from the colonies. This was actually part of the reason we ended up in a war for our independence. It may not have gone differently with a direct line, but we had to go through the undersecretary to the undersecretary to communicate with the British government. Which effectively made sure our concerns were never heard by the King until we petitioned him directly. Then he consulted his top advisor who also had not heard any concerns previously and they concluded the petition was worthless. To which we decided property destruction was the answer and cue the escalations.

      So what our founders wanted was an independent civil service, but they had no idea how to make one. They only knew about patronage systems. And the one lethal blow to any patronage system is to say you can hold this position for as long as you want, as long as you’re not corrupt. They knew it wasn’t perfect. And they openly said we should be holding Constitutional Conventions on the regular to improve on things like this. For the record the two competing models are to lean into partisanship and hold elections, or run the judiciary as a technocracy with limited sovereignty. So the judges would actually figure out the supreme court and lower courts themselves in that system. Much like our military does now.

      Both of those systems have their pros and cons but importantly, none of them stop determined ideological assaults on the institution. By the time you are hiring people it is too late to stop that. They’ve already been indoctrinated and they aren’t going to tell the truth about it publicly. (For example all the judges that overturned Roe v Wade, said it was settled law or something similar in their confirmation hearings. Then they flipped the literal second they had the majority on an abortion case.) You have to stop indoctrination at the source, in education. Which is why there’s such a huge push by conservative Christians to destroy public schools.

      Anyways that’s probably more than you wanted. TL;DR is it was the best system they had at the time, and they could not have foreseen fuckery like capping congress which obliterated the idea of actually representing the local views in a national body.

    • deltapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is. It’s illegal and it’s illegal to advocate for it, and it’s illegal to encourage someone else to do it. So I don’t wouldn’t do it, I don’t talk about it except in vague terms, and I don’t think you should do it either.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you’re going to do the thing with replacing Biden as the candidate, you couldn’t get better than AOC, who will be 35 before November.

    I personally think replacing Biden this late is a bad move even though I already think Biden sucks. But I grit my teeth and voted for the fucker just like I did with Clinton, because the alternative is literally insanity and fascism. I just don’t realsitically seeing the party coalesce around anyone new at the last minute. Organizing Democrats is like herding cats, being a big tent party sucks noodles.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve seen this criticism of replacing Biden often recently “it’s too late! We won’t have time!”

      Putting aside for the moment that it isn’t late at all and complaints that it is feel like talking points, Biden IS old. The stats on someone his age dying that year are extremely high. There is a good chance he dies before the election.

      If there isn’t a plan to deal with that fairly likely possibility, then there isn’t a plan to win.

      Anyone in a position of power in the DNC making this claim is them confessing their own incompetence.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Hey man I’ve been dealing with the shitty outcomes of the politicians who lead this party being unwilling to listen to the public until well after the public has been proven right for my entire adult life.

        I said Biden was too old in 2020. He’s even too older now. The party didn’t give a fuck and has spent their time hiding it and fucking us out of having primaries.

        Who do you think will choose the new candidate? The same super delegates who gave us Hillary Clinton? It won’t be a people’s vote at the convention, it will be delegates, many of which are party apparatchiks.

        Do you think the people who hid Biden’s issues this late in the game will suddenly make a good choice? I don’t. The party fucked us into this position and I do not think they are capable of unfucking us, sorry. Biden is who we have, alive or dead.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Party is bad. Might as well take what they give us” –Snot Flickerman

    • Ghostface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just keep repeating, Biden may not be the best, but his administration has been fantastic!

      In comparison to the other party… Not just Biden you are voting for the administration. Supreme court justices Which affect everyday life!

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Bidens state department has been horrific, as well as his defense department.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fuck yeah. Probably won’t go anywhere with a traitorous house majority but it’s worth it to try and get them on the record.

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wasn’t trump impeached twice? What does this even mean concretely?
    Not knocking the sentiment, just questioning the practicality

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Gives Dem voters something to rally around in the lead up to the election…

      Like. This is literally the time and place for performative actions, but I swear it’s like everyone’s forgot what the word “campaign” means.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    give me an AOC presidential candidacy and I’ll shut up about green party