Nobody is debating the issue at hand. We are debating the piss poor journalism that resulted in this headline

Also, I don’t mod this community

Ouch, it’s worse when you actually read it. It’s essentially saying “Trump said this, so they will do it”. It hasn’t happened yet, which is what the title implies.

Definitely not okay. And it depends on your definition of “normal”. Is it common? Somewhat. Going as far as to say “kill yourself” usually isn’t part of it but insulting someone after being rejected isn’t rare. It depends a bit on the age.

If it’s a best place to work, why would anyone want to work from home? I bet the mother just didn’t know that part or else she would’ve gone to the office

No, I bet this brilliant work of investigative journalism dug it up /s

Yeah… there are a lot of issues here. Serial killer vs spree killing, the use of IQ (where the hell would they get that?), and so many other weird things that you highlighted

And yeah, to your last point… the USA is definitely an outlier on inequality but you can’t compare “margins” like that lol

That’s not how “rates” work though

I inherited a fish over a year ago and now I’m obsessed with aquatic animals. Aquatic snails are super cool and I’ve started breeding them to resell. Y’know, until next year when I find something cooler. Love that ADHD life

Hello one of the oldest and most trusted Lemmy users, can I bribe you to use another platform with the world’s sketchiest link?

The one we just started?

I mean, how many rules are we expected to read?!

Oh, it’s the first rule?

Clearly a Democratic hoax. If he’s partying with Olympic celebs, how could he be doing his job?

This comment made me realize that English needs a word for “sequel to a sequel”

Last time I saw a good juggalo joke was Juggalos for Mitt. And that was like 2008

Just in time for the 250th. Which, of course, is why they targeted Philly before all the big celebrations

Really? You see a lot of CSAM? That’s not my understanding of it at all, but I’ll defer to the expert

How does CSAM tell you anything about the abuser? It only reveals the victim.

You want kid’s histories of child abuse viewable for… evidence?

Wow… yeah, we need to re-traumatize kids by posting their naked bodies online because that’s how we prove Epstein really abused kids

You want the CSAM to be viewable? You are calling for the public release of CSAM?

Oh I’m sorry that you only got the text releases, you really want the photos and videos that make up 98% of the data?

Edit: not defending the DoJ for covering up emails but “percentage of data” is a stupid metric here