Dispatch’s release on Nintendo platforms today was poised to be another testament to AdHoc’s tremendous success with the point-and-click superhero workplace comedy, but news of a platform-specific difference has overshadowed much of the excitement for fans hoping to play the episodic series on-the-go. Instead of celebrating the release, fans are launching campaigns against Dispatch’s censorship, returning their purchases, or refraining from playing it altogether.

Normally, Dispatch contains nudity and sexually explicit scenes involving its gang of ex-villains. AdHoc allows players to toggle sexual content like this off on most platforms. Curiously, however, the newly-released Switch version automatically depicts censored versions of these scenes. There’s no option to turn the setting off.

AdHoc confirmed the censorship to Eurogamer, but noted that the overall experience would still be the same for Switch players.


Mind you, Nintendo is cool with putting Doom and Duke Nukem on the Switch.

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    ·
    4 months ago

    Havent you heard? Violence appropriate, sex and nudity not. Its totally okay to see people being dismembered, but you better never show a nipple.

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep. In the words of George R. R. Martin

      “You can write the most detailed, vivid description of an ax entering a skull, and nobody will say a word in protest. But if you write a similarly detailed description of a penis entering a vagina, you get letters from people saying they’ll never read you again. What the hell? Penises entering vaginas bring a lot more joy into the world than axes entering skulls.”

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I recently published my novel, and at the last minute I had this panic about what was appropriate. There’s one bigoted character who calls gay people “f***ot” multiple times, as well as many characters that drop F-bombs on numerous occasions. There’s a (semi-magical) event similar to a mass shooting, many references to torture, and someone’s hand is chopped off. To be really safe, I put a content warning on the first page just to make some of that clear. Surely, that puts it a level beyond the Young Adult region, right? But…possibly not, given what I tend to hear offhand of some series.

        • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Stephen King’s best (solo) book, IT, has probably over 200 N-bombs in it. It’s still his best book. Very much a product of its time (and an author who was so coked up he doesn’t remember writing a lot of it), but still his best book.

          Your novel is Young Adult, or no? It’s not clear. I don’t know what the rules are for YA in America/Europe, but I’m reading the Sword Art Online series (rather, having anime lead Bryce Papenbrook read it to me, via the audiobooks) and SAO (which is LN which means Light Novel, which is Japan’s version of YA) has dismemberment. Arms being chopped off, people being chopped in half… the anime is known for its scenes of SA, but the first two weren’t SA in the books (the anime exaggerated what happened). The one in season 3 absolutely is an SA though. I haven’t gotten to the one in season 4 yet but I’ve heard it’s not. There’s also torture, but it’s not too serious. They’re playing video games, VR based. At one point the pain is amplified and a character is viciously attacked, so he feels it 10x more. In another case, people are trapped in a world that moves 1,000x slower than real life (so like a year in the game is like an hour in real life or something like that). The kind of stuff Black Mirror did (White Christmas, Black Museum, USS Callister). But not a lot of profanity. (Of course, I’m also reading it translated to English. I have no idea what Reki Kawahara actually wrote, because I would not be able to read the original Japanese text.)

      • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not really. Have violence without blood and they’ll rate it teen. Anything close to nudity instant mature rating. Same with searing. Can gun down hundreds if no blood but if they use naughty language while doing it mature /:

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, also if we argue that violent videogames don’t cause violence - what’s the problem with sexual content? If they’re censoring sexual stuff because they believe videogames if corrupt and change behaviour, the violent ones should definitely be banned.

      Also - I’m using Google’s Android keyboard and just realised the dictionary didn’t know the word ‘sexual’. Just in case someone might try to write something spicy. FFS. It knew ‘violent’ though.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The fact that they allow Resident Evil Village of all games on the Switch but don’t allow this animated nudity scene is insane to me. RE Village was one of the most graphic games I have ever seen.

    edit: I Just realized Cyberpunk 2077 was released on it no censorship. How did dispatch get censored but that was allowed through lmao

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Unconfirmed, but the rumor I’m hearing is that AdHoc submitted one universal binary for all regions, and it’s CERO who won’t allow this content in Japan. FWIW, the JP version of Cyberpunk is also censored, but it’s separate from the international release.

      It’s also worth noting that the JP PS5 version just launched alongside it, separate from last year’s international version. Haven’t been able to find confirmation on whether that version is censored too, but if it is then it’s definitely CERO.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think this is very likely the reason yea.

        I’m also now finding out that they had to censor the coverart of the switch 2 edition a few weeks ago as well which I was unaware of. If it turns out they knew for awhile that it would be censored, and just chose not to tell anyone that is going to permanently damper my opinion of their studio. Like it’s one thing to be like “This was forced upon us last minute so we threw a solution together” it’s a whole different situation of knowing that it was going to happen, then refusing to tell the consumers about it since you knew it would lower sales.

        Along with that, we asked for comment from AdHoc concerning the decision to censor Dispatch’s Deluxe Edition artwork on the Nintendo eShop as compared to the PC/PS5 release, and if that indicated any censorship in the game itself. We were told that “unfortunately, the studio cannot comment on the topic at this time.” Along with that, it was said that if AdHoc is able to discuss the matter down the road, their comment would be shared with us.

        It sounds to me like they knew this change was going to be required at that point, but didn’t want to publicly announce that, which puts a pretty bad taste in my mouth about the intent of the studio.

        • missingno@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, regardless of where it came from, the lack of disclosure reflects very poorly on AdHoc.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Neither was particularly sexually explicit IIRC.

      I dunno, though. Maybe censorship was an “easier” ask since the setting was already there.

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            This is likely it.

            There is also the rumor that this wasn’t a choice by Nintendo, but a choice of the dev’s so they didn’t have to have two separate editions to be able to sell in Japan(like they already do for the playstation edition). If that’s the case this makes it even worse IMO since it wasn’t like a last minute “BTW this is a thing” they had plenty of time to tell buyers that the product was altered

  • hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Entirely unwise to buy anything non-Nintendo on the Nintendo Store as if the Switch’s entire purpose wasn’t to just get people to buy a $500 appliance to play a Nintendo game.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      And brick your shit (without refunds) for the slightest hint you’re against Nintendo. Fuck Nintendo.

        • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          If they think you’re doing anything they don’t like, they can remote block you from Nintendo networks. Which I’m fine with, but it prevents you from being able to reset the device or play local games.

          So anything you bought is now useless and unplayable, they got your money, so fuck you.

          • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Even in the argument that you only bought a license to the game (not the game itself); why are they not required to refund the license they took from you? The deal is broken, give the money back.

            • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Exactly. If they want to block their network, fine, but to not allow you to play physical games you bought, fuck that. I’ll never give Nintendo another dollar. I have a steam deck and hacked switch, fuck them. And I share all their rooms on soulseek, including switch roms.

  • Lembot_0006@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    At this point, after all nintendoing Nintendo did, people still give them money. And who is the crazy in this situation?

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    I just heard about this earlier today. My biggest issue is that this wasn’t something they made people aware of prior? It absolutely should have been disclosed prior to release. I hear good things about the game, i just know not to buy it on switch.

  • mohab@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    Mind you, Nintendo is cool with putting Doom and Duke Nukem on the Switch.

    And literally owns Bayonetta 😂

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    The amount of waifu and furry porn games in the Switch store is higher than you’d think. Why censor Dispatch?

  • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is good. People are learning through experience to not buy any non-exclusive game through Nintendo.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      When people learn to not buy anything whatsoever Nintendo, I will have a little more hope for humanity.

      • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        In fairness I have experienced the temptation to buy a Switch 2 simply for Mario Kart World. The game looks like a masterpiece that you can’t get anywhere else. The only limiting factor was Nintendo’s management of the game and how they force people to play intermissions. (And 500 dollars holy shit). But then Sonic Racing Crossworlds released and it was good enough for me.

        That’s why in my original comment I said non-exclusive games because if we purely looked at the games, a lot of the exclusive games are bangers so I understand why people still buy from Nintendo.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I watched Charlie play through the first episode, and within the first 5 or so minutes of the game there’s full-frontal with dick and balls. He had to censor his game of course, but you know it’s there.

  • lofuw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m so fucking sick of censorship and the morons that perpetuate it.

    If you don’t want to see something? Fine. That doesn’t mean you should get to hide it from everyone else, though.