That’s literally not what they said, or implied. I hope you’re just bad at reading and social comprehension, someone else may take up explaining it to you.
Unless you’re a bot or a paid actor. (Or did the writer edit their comment to add “rich” after you posted? That might be implied by the couple of comments below.)
Fuck yes, it (Killing Eve if I’m not mistaken) was great.
But what if you ever lose the ability to breathe but not walk?
Of course true, just a dream 🥲
Yeah, when you’re going 90km/h, it’s fucking idiotic. It’s way too fucking close, you’re going to kill someone. Random brake check incoming!
There is no Firefox without people’s desire for privacy. There is no sufficient privacy without people removing the diseased fingerprint of multiple big companies.
There is no possibility of a big browser surviving, without caving to big companies, in the artificially hostile web created by Google’s monopoly.
And that last one is fundamentally unfair, beyond any accusation of “Derivative!” anyone can make.
My mental illness is a convenient side effect of society’s plan to literally weaken its populace for the sake of control and political stability 💕
(It’s the God one, just replacing God with the ruling class 🥰)
That’s every company though
Sure, no objections there
So, to condense the article:
We are having a tough time! We’re thinking of closing our German factories, and ending our “We don’t fire people” Guarantee!
Politicians, please save us by regulating our competitors and exempting us from sales tax on new technologies!
Why?
Because our primary source of money before, was selling in China (40% to 50% of earnings), and now Chinese EVs have taken over both China and the local market! So, with our shitty expensive EVs, we can’t compete, and, worst of all, China is buying less from us, so we are losing all that money!
Opinion:
We kept selling to the most vulnerable market and pocketing innovation money, and now we got out-innovated and that market is no longer vulnerable!
Please give us tax-money and regulate our competitors away, otherwise we will make a political stink, and throw workers on the street!
You can legally kill anyone related to someone who has had Disney+.
Iirc, the wife died, the husband sued, and they tried to say the husband can’t sue because HE had had the subscription a long time ago.
Each subscriber loses the right to sue for any of their loved ones.
After all, if they’re dead, they can’t sue you anyway
Lol
A record of records
I know you might be joking for hyperbole, but still. If you burn it, you can’t read what runs through their and their friends’ head, and you lose the historical value of having access to this period’s political pulse later.
And I don’t think these books turn people fascist. They only consolidate them.
If we want to stop fascism, part of the solution is stopping the root of the problem, where people become fascists. And our best bet on that is understanding.
Oh no. I guess the only reasonable response is to bomb another children’s hospital.
The Guardian has dropped the ball a bunch of times.
A non-name media org is less likely to be a target for rich fucks who want to pay to push their agenda through a big, recognizable, reputable source.
The bigger the organisation, the greater the chances it will be corrupted, in ways big and small, by rich fucks.
God damn acab I swear
… Yeah it is 🫠🥲
In literal terms it translates to “before-the-road” (pro - drómou)
(this literal translation includes the ambiguity of before- as in ‘temporally before’, or before- as in ‘in front of’)
So any way you slice it, it’s pretty ironic.
“Prodromou” is a Greek surname, with the rough meaning “the one who walks the road before others”.
So him being “a visionary” is fun, lol
Hopefully knives and female genitals don’t mix either.
One word: “Zippers”.