Because, to Republicans, if you commit crime, you are therefore a bad person, and deserve punishment. There’s no logic to it, it’s that bad people deserve bad things to happen to them. It’s not about rehabilitating anyone, nor do they care to do that.

Only bad people would commit crime, and bad people deserve pain, cruelty, and nothing else ever. Since they’re not dead and can’t burn in hell, it becomes the duty of the state to make sure they live a version of hell until they die.

That’s their philosophy. It’s a big part of what makes them horrible terrible evil people. And what does it come from? Their vile, disgusting religion.

“But doesn’t their religion preach forgiveness and redemption?“ You might ask. Yes, but only for them and their friends. Because their religion also teaches hypocrisy.

Red state craziness, all the people who might have resisted their crazy bullshit flee after their kids get persecuted or their industry gets wrecked or whatever other terrorizing bullshit policies their lawmakers can dream up to troll progressives, and then everything really starts to spiral as the craziness blows up in their own faces and their only viable political message is “actually we just weren’t crazy enough to get results!”

e; Also, related bit of research from a few years ago I think everyone should read, “A Police Stop Is Enough to Make Someone Less Likely to Vote”

A study I co-authored with fellow researcher Kevin Morris, published in December in the American Political Science Review, finds that traffic stops by police stops in Hillsborough County reduced voter turnout in 2014, 2016, and 2018 federal elections.

Our study compared the voter turnout of Hillsborough motorists who were stopped by police shortly before and after each election. Drawing on information about each person’s turnout in past cycles, we found that these stops reduced the likelihood that a stopped individual turned out to vote by 1.8 percentage points on average. The effect held when accounting for characteristics like race, gender, party affiliation, past turnout, and prior traffic stops to improve our comparisons. The discouraging effect of stops was slightly higher in 2014 and 2018.

These results make clear that the collateral consequences of policing—including worsening outcomes for economic security, educational attainment, and health—also extend to political participation. If the communities who are most frequently subjected to policing are also discouraged from voting as a result, it could create a vicious feedback loop of political withdrawal.

Why would traffic stops make people less likely to show up to the polls? Past research has already established that the most disruptive forms of criminal legal contact, like arrest and incarceration, discourage people from voting. Our study shows that low-level police contact matters in the same way. If a traffic stop makes a motorist fear that the government will harm them, it can prompt a withdrawal from civic life that political scientists call “strategic retreat.” Motorists might worry that a routine traffic stop could escalate into police violence, a more common outcome for Black people in particular. Beyond justified fears of violent victimization, voters might also bristle at the perception of being targeted to raise revenue through excessive ticketing. Accordingly, if incarceration ‘teaches’ would-be voters that their government is an alienating and harmful force in their lives, traffic stops could catalyze a similar form of ‘learning.’

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20260514053348/https://boltsmag.org/a-police-stop-is-enough-to-make-someone-less-likely-to-vote/

The system is working as intended. Private prisons shouldn’t exist.

Rehabilitation should always be the goal.

Corrupt politicians and for-profit prison companies think otherwise. Recidivism, slavery, and scary headlines are the goal.