• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    178
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Killing libraries is not about saving money, it’s about restricting knowledge. Beware the leader that doesn’t want the people to read.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can’t they just sell one of those sound-weapon equipped tanks from the NYPD to cover the entire library budget?

  • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    As the cousin of a NY public librarian, fuck mayor Adams, but for so many more reasons than this.

    Stop voting cops in as mayor’s, because at the end of the day they’re still just corrupt cops.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    The picture included makes me think we should challenge the mayor’s hotshot skier son to a race down Triple Diamond run, and if we win the library will be saved for us punk kids to use on Sundays.

  • therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t care if libraries get used or not, they NEED to be kept open. For the sake of information keeping and internet for those who don’t have any at home

  • Rose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh no. You know shit is really terrible when they cannot even afford to communicate at 8 bits. It’s 5 bits Baudot code. Capital letters only. They actually had to pay extra for @, #, and $. Thankfully, by 1870s, % was part of the character set. My heart’s with anyone who can’t just blast UTF-8 out wherever they can.

    (Edit: In case you’re wondering why it has a weird gif attached to it: The Memelord, Musky Elon, has decreed that you can actually attach a shitty random gif FOR FREE. So of course any cash strapped institution will do so.)

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Libraries provide a host of public services beyond “warehouse for books”. A big part of our digital archives come from library digitization programs. And knowing how to sort, store, and distribute this information is a vital piece of library science.

      Losing libraries means losing the tools we use to organize information on a national scale.

      • librejoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        yes. Personally, i use libraries because I cannot afford buying a book (mostly programming) and I don’t like split screen and can’t afford another monitor. I have used the library here in Toronto so many times they know me by name now at two branches.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    Idk about NYC, but my local library might as well rebrand to a homeless shelter. I love the concept of libraries, but if they aren’t going to throw out the homeless people using it as a place to jerk off and do drugs, then idk what to do. I personally don’t feel safe at ours, especially with my kids.

    • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Seriously, have you considered that the same ideology that strive to choke public libraries, also the one that push people to homelessness? (At least unsheltered homelessness)

      • Apeman42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean, this but unironically? No one should be seeing homeless people because they shouldn’t be homeless.

        • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          But they do exist, something systematic must be changed for then not to exist. (Public housing, maybe?)

          But until than, what?