@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 16 days agoRand Paul Fears Trump Tariffs Could Mean 1930s-Style Republican Wipeout: ‘We Lost the House and Senate for 60 Years’www.mediaite.comexternal-linkmessage-square354fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1external-linkRand Paul Fears Trump Tariffs Could Mean 1930s-Style Republican Wipeout: ‘We Lost the House and Senate for 60 Years’www.mediaite.com@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 16 days agomessage-square354fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•15 days agoI understand that you feel the conclusion is disturbing. Can you elaborate on what part of their reasoning is confusing?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•15 days agoI suppose the part that leads to mass murder.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•15 days agoDo you think it’s murder to kill a Nazi?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•15 days agoI believe it is justified. But I’m not going to dignify the question of “is it murder to kill a Nazi” with an answer.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•15 days ago So you’re not disagreeing that they’re Nazis. And you don’t disagree that killing them is justified. But you’re unwilling to dignify the question you just asked with an answer. So absent an honest answer, it looks like you’re bringing up legal semantics to make killing Nazis sound bad.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•15 days agojfc. I don’t have time for this bullshit. Have a nice day.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•15 days agoBullshit like asking a question you wouldn’t answer yourself? Or bullshit like saying you “don’t have time” once it’s clear you’re arguing in bad faith?
I understand that you feel the conclusion is disturbing. Can you elaborate on what part of their reasoning is confusing?
I suppose the part that leads to mass murder.
Do you think it’s murder to kill a Nazi?
I believe it is justified. But I’m not going to dignify the question of “is it murder to kill a Nazi” with an answer.
But you’re the one calling it murder.
You didn’t think it is?
So you’re not disagreeing that they’re Nazis.
And you don’t disagree that killing them is justified.
But you’re unwilling to dignify the question you just asked with an answer.
So absent an honest answer, it looks like you’re bringing up legal semantics to make killing Nazis sound bad.
jfc. I don’t have time for this bullshit. Have a nice day.
Bullshit like asking a question you wouldn’t answer yourself? Or bullshit like saying you “don’t have time” once it’s clear you’re arguing in bad faith?