• TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I agree that they public schools should teach the history and dangers of communism. And the history and dangers of capitalism. And the history and danger of monarchies. And the history and dangers of democracy (and republics). And especially the history and dangers of fascism.

    Those are all important subjects to teach, and there is not a governmental or economic system in current or previous existence that wasn’t vulnerable to corruption, inefficiency, or evil in some way. An educated populous is the way to mitigate those vulnerabilities.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Just teach the dangers of authoritarianism in general - but you see that would paint too close an image of the current republican party.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Him being stuck about 50 years in the past on the perceived threat of Communism is on point when looking at the rest of his agenda.

    • massive_bereavement@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      Well, conservatism pushes a lot the idea that the 50s and somehow 60s was when “America was great”.
      I’m perplexed they thought of getting back into mccarthyism, but of course they’ll get that low if they’re desperate.

      I’m just worried this is a very ugly can of worms they might be opening here.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Considering how many repubs are sucking russias dick and putin is the guy who wants to bring back the ussr… it’s surprising he is talking shit about communism…when his entire party is sucking putins communist dick

      • Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        Communism and Dictatorship are opposites and not compatible at all. Communism, by definition, demands the “withering away of the state”. Putin is just a right wing dictator. He envisions himself as Russia’s literal Tzar, right down to using the crest on his massive estate compound. He has no interest in communism in either name or form.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          No shit. That was the point. They’re all about how bad communism is, but are in bed with a guy who wants to bring the ussr back together. Communism doesn’t work because it turns always into a authoritarian society. The joke was that the repubs are in bed with a state that was all about communism back in putins day.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Choosing what Religions are real and what Students HAVE to be taught in School is called SMALL GOVERNMENT!

  • BillDaCatt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    The only danger I see in communism is that no matter how benevolent it starts, communism will always (eventually) become a dictatorship. If we could somehow take human greed out of the equation, communism could be really nice for everyone. As long as humans are in charge, communism will suck for nearly everyone.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      From my understanding, one of the aspects to creating a communist nation is to create a dictatorship in order to throw out the existing political system before then rightfully ceding power to the proletariat. That last step never actually happens in reality, however.

      • Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        One of the challenges in Leftist philosophy is “What is the road from here to there.”

        Lenin argued that the only feasible way to attain the desired leftist ends was via rightist means. Lenin learned the hard way that this simply cannot work, because once you’ve consolidated power like that, it doesn’t take much - a small group or just one ambitious person (like Stalin) - to seize and keep power.

        Any leftist ends must be gained by leftist means; with popular support, and without allowing wealth or power to ever become further concentrated.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Swap out “Communism” with “Russia” and then you have something. But I don’t think that’s a door he wants to open.

    • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      yeah this is the confusing part - they’re still able to call “communism” the “bad guy”, but then somehow cozy up with russia - the “OG communists”?

  • Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Oh yay, jingoist lies and propaganda are making a comeback.

    I’m sure they’ll remember to accurately point out how every government that has ever claimed to be communist was actually a right-wing dictatorship.

  • deafboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Any educated individual should already be able to figure out the dangers of communism. If they’re not, what the hell is wrong with the american education system?