• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I see incredibly violent and bigoted content all the time on Meta platforms and always report it. Rarely does anything get taken down. But feminism bad I suppose.

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The CIA via its VC fund InQTel is the architect of today’s information landscape. All of this is very much on purpose.

  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Regulating Meta which is truly accountable nowhere is like trying to find a good place to store radioactive waste for tens of thousands of years. Everyone outside the US should just ban them.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    191
    ·
    8 days ago

    Meta wants to be the global town square, but apparently Virginia Woolf and feminism are too dangerous for its ad system. Meanwhile the company keeps asking us to trust its algorithms with billions of people’s speech. If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content, maybe it shouldn’t be the internet’s self appointed censor.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content,

      You misunderstand… Feminist literature is the prohibited content. I’m not making a joke here. That’s literally their policy!

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Stop being political!” say the people running the manufactured hate machine.

  • velma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The production in question is an adaptation of “A Room of One’s Own,” a book by the legendary English author and feminist Virginia Woolf. According to the Teatre Raval, planned promotional posts about the show were blocked on both Instagram and Facebook, likely by an automated content moderation system.

    After reaching out to Meta about why the promo campaign had been stomped out, the company replied that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected.

    According to the Guardian, the company then cryptically recommended the Raval remove “key words” related to social activism, so the promo campaign can pass the automated censor — though the company failed to explain what, exactly, its content system objected to.

    ”We don’t know if the publicity has been rejected because of the name of Virginia Woolf or because of the word feminism, or both,” Clara Sanchis, who stars in the one-woman show told the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia, per the Guardian, which translated the comments.

    “In any case, it’s a way of erasing from the map advances that have taken centuries to achieve,” Sanchis continued. “We have given social media unlimited power and every day we can see how dangerous this is. It’s bias and manipulation.”

    It’s not going to stop at Meta just like it did not stop at Roe v Wade being overturned.

    I’m sick of men telling me that I’m overreacting about these issues.

      • velma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Absolutely. It’s not just the censorship though - it’s the attack on women’s rights that I’m referencing.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sick of men telling me that I’m overreacting about these issues.

      The ones telling you that you’re over reacting are the ones who have a vested interest in your downfall

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t take that shit from no man. They can think whatever the fuck that want of me. I don’t need anyone let alone a fucking little bitch of a man acting as if he’s better than me.

      • velma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Hell yes.

        I’m going to keep telling men that they’re wrong as long as they want to tell me I’m overreacting. I’m not scared of doing so.

        I’m just sick of it.

    • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      And what is really gross is that they will place it at the level of social/corporate discourse. Continuing the facade that they are a “publisher” and not town square.

      Meaning there will be no legal option to prevent groups like meta/FB and Twitter from throttling down real social issues. While turning the volume up on “state approved rebellion”.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      The United States and its most powerful corporations now fully and openly embrace fascism. Revolution is our only hope now, there is no one coming to save us but ourselves. Join your local socialist group and start training now. Don’t wait for the mass arrests to begin.

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I stopped using Facebook years ago.

        Before there were viable alternatives.

        The idea that you need Facebook because there aren’t significant alternatives is just not true.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        No alternative is viable if no one uses it.

        The network effect is real, and it’s what lets these fascism pushers stay top of mind at all times.

      • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        7 days ago

        The problem is that this isn’t like Microsoft Office > LibreOffice/OnlyOffice/whatever. You’re not on Facebook for Facebook, you’re on Facebook for the people there. It’s why I have a lot of issues getting off of YouTube. I’m not on YouTube because their interface is nice, I’m on YouTube because the people I want to watch don’t post shit elsewhere. It’s a cycle, to get users we need stuff, and for stuff we need creators, and for creators we need users. When it comes to online platforms we don’t need an alternative to YouTube, we need an alternative to Markiplier, which is harder to come up with.

        If you can get your friends, and family onto Friendica that would help quite a bit. The problem is that using a new server is hard for the end user (I would know, all of my fediverse presence is on servers I host), and telling someone “Use Friendica” is like telling someone to “Use email”. Get a Friendica/Mastodon/Whatever server, and keep it in your back pocket. Give them a link to that server, not to Friendica/Mastodon/Whatever as a whole.

        Admittedly I don’t know how hard it is to stop using Facebook because I stopped using Facebook right after they took away the chronological timeline, and stopped using Messenger a few years ago. But spending some time to get a timeline together that you can boost will help any new users you recruit. Crucially, to promote viable alternatives, you need to be part of the viable alternatives, otherwise you’re just someone telling someone to jump into something new with 0 guidance, which is a good way to have them leave.

        • kossa@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          to get users we need stuff, and for stuff we need creators, and for creators we need users

          Don’t know. When YouTube started, there were creators, but no users and no way to monetize. Problem is, we are so used to the high production value on YouTube, where people can (and more often than not hope to) make money, so we don’t give the poor production value videos a chance anymore. But we watched that 140p video back then, because there was nothing else and it was interesting.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        The viable alternative is nothing.

        Because no one gives a shit about you (general you, not specific at BitsAndBites), or about what you say. You use it cause you’re addicted to performing for people you dont even talk to or like, because no one can actually maintain hundreds, if not thousands of connections like you collect on facebook, most of whom don’t even give a shit about you. its just a mutual masturbation session, only instead of jerking each others dicks off, your jerking eachother off with pointless likes.

        All social media is, is a means of generating profit from mental illness, and manufacturing mental illness for profit.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          You use it cause ~you’re addicted to performing for people you dont even talk to or like~ it’s the only place to get and share updates from your extended family

          • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Holy shit send them a text ask them how they’re doing, maybe even a phone call. You don’t have to choose to give mark zuckerberg a monopoly on your family’s stories and memories.

      • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Facebook to Friendica

        Twitter/Threads to Mastodon/Euclavd

        Instagram to Pixelfed/Vernissage

        Tiktok to Loops

        YouTube to PeerTube

        Anything else?

        Edit:

        Whatsapp to Signal/Delta Chat/Cwtch/Briar

        Reddit to Lemmy/Piefed/Pylova

        • obvs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Loops

          I wish every content creator would post on both TikTok AND Loops, because Loops could definitely replace TikTok. It has a really solid basis and a lot of potential(although I wish I didn’t have to pause before scrolling off of a video).

          I am really glad to see someone mention Loops, and if I could choose to view someone’s content on Loops instead of TikTok, I would.

          Edit: Oh, and https://loops.video/ if anyone is wondering what we’re talking about.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Now do whatsapp, the default messaging platform for the majority of the world.

          • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Signal or threema i got both never used WhatsApp ever. There’s also sms, samsung and apple chat which are about as secure as WhatsApp is

            • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Now which of those is available worldwide?

              There are parts of the world where you can get online and on Facebook/whatsapp without even having “internet”. If you pay for Internet, you get access to other websites as well.

              • Hawke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Not one of those but XMPP (once upon a time called Jabber) is available worldwide.

                So is Matrix.

                • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Some places you get internet, but you’re limited to 3-4 “basic” sites unless you pay for it. Facebook/Whatsapp is often one of those basic sites. Or was.

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        “Let’s have tacos tonight.” “Nah Im not feeling tacos.” “OK let’s get Chinese food.” “Nah i don’t want Chinese food.” "…ok… let’s make soup. " “Nah I don’t want soup tonight.”

        • undrwater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          This made me thoughtful and laugh at the same time, thank you.

          You’re right, of course. People prefer centralized platforms, and we “nerds” prefer decentralized ones.

          There are no alternatives.

    • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      the problem is people are so addicted to it, at least in my province. They don’t want to hear about any alternative that would require the smallest effort. In the 80’s, Dead Kennedys made an album called “Give me convenience or give me death”. I took me decades to realize how accurate this title was for depicting the world we live in.

    • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      And also Instagram and whatever other Zuck products are in your life. I’m happy they wasted so many billions of dollars setting of virtual Mii meetings lmao…

  • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    8 days ago

    Oh so they are capable of banning the ones they don’t like, just not the ones that are actively harmful and illegal?

    Fuck off meta. Really wish more people would stop using their shit. Shun those who work for them while you are at it. You work for the nonce glasses company? Eww

  • undrwater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 days ago

    “After reaching out to Meta about why the promo campaign had been stomped out, the company replied that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected.”

    Wow.

    • redditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      not that i’m a meta fan, I fucking hate that company, but this swings both ways. Imagine your local coffee shop is boosting posts about traditional marriage and pro-life themes. They get blocked as well.

      • madeofpendletonwool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I just don’t go to that coffee shop. Problem solved. They can say whatever they want. If I don’t support it I don’t go. I don’t see how the coffee shop argument hold up. And if enough people hold the same views they close.

        Meta however is too big to fail. Which gives them a free pass to pass their cancerous views onto society while knowing no matter how much the general public hates them and their shitty views they will continue to use the platform because their friends and family still use it. Enshittification. If my coffee shop enshittifies I tell them to pound sand.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        There’s no way to get around “any mention of civil rights” though. That covers all humans.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        They do pay “content creators” who have views on the opposite side of the political aisle and when caught paying far-right activists, they said:

        “Such speech may be offensive to many, but it is not Meta’s role to police offensiveness,” the company added.

        While PAYING to advertise a book with feminism as a theme is not OK. They’re clearly pushing an agenda.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Maybe. This was an advertisement for a book that had those themes.

        Personally, I don’t want either to be excluded.