• tree_frog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    228
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m not sure if the article covers it, still reading, but one of the things they want to do to disenfranchise transfoks is to require the the name on your birth certificate matches you’re legal name in order to vote.

    As most married women don’t change their name on their birth certificate when they take their husbands last name, they would not be able to vote either.

    Edit: The article does go into all of this.

    • Banana@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Interesting thing about that is that, while it’s still common practice, a lot of more left-leaning women did away with taking their husband’s name years ago

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah my wife and I just kept our name. Its funny because over the years we sorta wish we would have done the traditional thing as it would make a variety of things easier but now apparently its becoming a brilliant move.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            yeah it was a slow burn annoyance and she gets annoyed by it more than I but it took like 20 odd years to be like. This is sorta annoying. EDITED - hey so im rethinking and it started at about the 10 year mark and built up over time but as I said its little things. My wife has a lot of medical issues though so we might have more nuisance around it than the typical couple.

      • tree_frog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Left leaning women are also far less likely to get married to begin with.

        The article actually points all of that out, it will be Republican women who mostly are disenfranchised by this.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          In a sort of twisted way that could result in a blue wave if they disenfranchised ~half of their own voters and not the left.

          • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            6 months ago

            They’ll presumably remedy this by giving husbands extra votes on behalf of their wives and children, as in Franco-era Spain.

        • Banana@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          My mom never took my dad’s so I grew up with that being the norm, so I took it step further and my partner and I are not even married despite being together 11 years.

            • Banana@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Tbqh i don’t know if we are ever gonna get married, just because it’s not the main priority, but I do make sure he’s my beneficiary for most things.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I took my spouse’s name because I hated my old one.

        But I will happily be a class representative for the lawsuit against this bill.

    • wirebeads@lemmy.caBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      6 months ago

      Holy. Fucking. Shit. That’s bad. That’s oppressively stupid fucking bad.

      Hey Americans: Don’t want to be oppressed or live in a fascist state? Immigrate to Canada! We’re hella friendly and open to people’s of all kinds, except MAGAs and Nazis and or maga-nazis

        • wirebeads@lemmy.caBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          Hmm. You all raise a good point. As Canadians, I think we need to make it easier for Americans to immigrate here.

          We need to experience and expertise and we need to learn how to expedite that to bring the right people here to help expand Canadas capabilities.

          Canadians, how to we make this happen? I have zero knowledge how to make this happen.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            You guys seem to have a very open asylum policy. Give it a few years and a lot of Americans might qualify without you doing anything else.

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would move up there next week if it was that easy and didn’t mean probably losing my awesome job. Oh, and it might be a bit disruptive for my family, too.

      • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I was going to say, “no, stay and fight”, but on second thought I agree with this sentiment for more vulnerable groups like trans folks

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m moving to Sweden but I’ll be stopping by your way first! I’m too trans to let tsa look at my passport so I’m going to land travel to you all and take a plane out from there

          • nickiwest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            Unless things have changed significantly at the border in the past few years, there’s no process to leave the US. It’s just the Canadian border guard checking things as you enter their country.

            Of course, if the GOP decides to fully enact Operation: Handmaid’s Tale, then that could change.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m still happy with Massachusetts, but my company is based in UK and we have an office outside Toronto. The road is paved

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ha, if only that was an actual possibility. Most Americans will not qualify for immigration to Western countries.

        I’d also hold off on thinking you’ll be safe. Poilievre might be unpopular now, but there’s a lot of time between now and the election. It’s not a slam dunk for Liberal, fascism can absolutely still rise in your country too.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Eh…

        We’re not a consolation prize, they’ve let shit get fucked in their country for decades.

        • wirebeads@lemmy.caBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah. You’re absolutely right, but there’s still a ton of good Americans that Canada could utilize to help us build our industry that we need.

          We need more than just exploited real estate in this country, and I’m sure a ton of Americans could help us make that happen at an accelerated level.

          I’d much prefer to take in Americans that are disenfranchised with their country, than have a disenfranchised country try and turn us into a new Guam.

      • tree_frog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        If it’s a legal name change. But I assume a lot of Hollywood names aren’t legally changed, but more similar to a pen name.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It depends on how much paperwork you do when you change your names, how much autocracy you want to fight

        When my ex divorced me she warned me me she wasn’t going through that again so I just need to deal with her keeping my name. She kept half of everything else of mine so I guess it’s no difference

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well that was the thing. If we did it off the bat it was like a checkbox, but to do it later is a larger nuissance than the nuissance of them being different.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Long term, this seems like an effective way to end that custom. What person would go into marriage changing their name when they know this attitude is at play?

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s cute you think that’s not another right they’ll quickly take away from women as soon as they can.

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Republicans destroy marriage with this one neat trick!

          If they force women to change their names with marriage, women will simply stop getting married.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oh you sweet summer child…

            “We need Christian men leading the fight against abortion,” arguing that women’s suffrage was a mistake, and accusing Hawkins of emasculating her husband by being “busy jet-setting.”

            This is only the first step. It will not stop until women are property.
            If you don’t get married than your father will own you until he decides who you will marry.

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yep, that’s in there:

      House Republicans passed a bill (which stalled in the Senate) this session to require citizens to have a passport or birth certificate matching their name to vote.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      In British Columbia, there is no legal requirement to change your last name after marriage, and either spouse can legally use either last name at their leisure without any bureaucratic change. It is a genderless law.

      Fuckin A, now I am really appreciating that.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      My wife and I were talking about this last night. She chose not to change her name when we got married, as she’s been down that road before and has no desire to do it again. I’m totally fine with it, she’s been able to grow and discover things about herself now that she “wasn’t allowed to” in her past marriage, and I love helping her realize that. We also just got our passports the other day - work wants me to get mine and paid for it, so she got hers as well.

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    6 months ago

    Remember the MAGA women wearing the “You Can Grab My Pussy” shirts? Not all Republican women are going to be upset by this.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Imagine how little self-respect you’d have to have to be a woman and vote Republican.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      6 months ago

      Making sure that women have very little self-respect is one of the primary functions of American Evangelicalism.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well surely it was never going to affect them. They are one of the good ones, it’s the others that need to be controlled. Why would they ever come for me if I am living a proper God fearing life?

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Lydia, it’s because you vote for forcing others to do things they don’t believe in, not the specific things that are targeted at this moment

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not a USA citizen, but a Hungarian, but I think some stuff still holds ground in the USA ground: They primarily think these right-wing radicals are just “jolly little conservatives”, and not radicals, since they call themselves “conservatives”. Contrary to the naive liberal belief, conservatism isn’t just a jolly little belief of personally held traditions and healthy patriotism, it’s just “fascism lite” which will turn full-out fascism once the checks and balances are removed, or getting extremely frustrated with social change.

      And also there’s the whole “you will get more conservative as you get older” propaganda, which makes a lot of young people “skip the liberalism and fast-forward to the inevitable”, and they either want to remain conservatives because “jolly little belief of personally held traditions and healthy patriotism”, or they believe they can’t leave. Many also go down the hate road, and they’ll get called all kinds of names if they forgive wrongdoers who were part of a minority, and they don’t weaponize that wrongdoing into genocidal thoughts. We seriously need to counter this whole “you will get more conservative as you get older” with something. Can someone contact Innuendo Studios? I have an idea for an episode of “The Alt-Right Playbook” if he still haven’t made one on this topic.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      They unironically think Harris was some kind of monster and that it was all worth it to keep trans out of sports.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There is a real lack of critical thinking, too. I legit know a few Republican women that honestly think that not eating meat will make a man effeminate, and that men that eat meat are more manly.

      Obviously due to stupid marketing, but even in their cinematic universe where this is “true” it makes no sense and has no consistency. I’ve asked them if they think that women that eat meat are going to spontaneously sprout a penis.

  • Birch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    6 months ago

    I can’t help but think of how this cartoon from the beginning of November got it completely backward

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Thank you I absolutely love Photoshop battles this was like 90 seconds in Gimp.

            I would have preferred to have folded the uniforms, tucked them under their arms and gotten rid of some of the white space in the upper right but time makes fools of us all.

            It’s kind of unfortunate the community never took off over here.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              6 months ago

              Man I’d love to see Photoshop battles make a comeback on Lemmy. Seems like the perfect sized community for it.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Tis is gonna be one of the most delicious schadenfraude of all. They think they are safe, but soon enough they are going to discover how important is being a white straight able-bodied male for these fascists. And how unimportant they are outside of a bedroom or a kitchen.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You’re overestimating Republican women…

      Ever hear one of those stories about a Military wife who believes Rank is sexual transmitted so she has all the authority of her husband?

      That’s how they think.

      It’s not that all women are lower than all men, it’s that the wife has the defacto “rank” as the their husband.

      Disclaimer:

      Obviously I’m not saying I agree with it, but that’s how they think and why they’re ok with this.

      You have to think like them, they’re “property” so treating a man’s wife badly is like going up and pissing on his giant truck, the man will “handle” the offense. And the only way for a woman to gain social ranking is marrying a “powerful” man.

      A frightening amount of woman think that’s a good system.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          6 months ago

          Bruh…

          The county I grew up in voted 95% plus trump in the last three elections.

          It was weird to run into anyone who didn’t think like that till I was over 18 and in college. Even then at a red state college, lots of women viewed themselves as status symbols. Their self worth was solely determined by the “best” guy that would date them.

          Like, for large parts of America that’s still the norm. And no amount of “Yaaaas Queen” social media posts will change their thinking. It’s not even that they’re trapped and need saved, that’s the life they choose a lot of the time, you don’t have to grow up in it.

          But everyone still acted shocked women were voting for trump.

          If we dont understand why they’re doing it, we’ll never change their minds.

    • Cows Look Like Maps@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I will not enjoy seeing all American women being marginalised. I will, however, enjoy seeing Americans finally exercising their right to protest a fascist government.

    • Ixoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      But rather than treating their wives better, MAGA men are looking at making it illegal for their wives to leave them. >

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Look at how Teheran women were dressed in the 70s, and contrast that to how they’re dressed now. The same future awaits American women.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yeah, no. US society is nothing like islamic societies. A faction if the rabid right thinks like this, and the rest of the right may agree to an extent, but they are aware that they can’t sell that to the majority. Plus, too many women jusdges.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        6 months ago

        All it takes is heavy propaganda that exaggerates the upsides and downplays the downsides, while shutting down dissidence.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          6 months ago

          And they will still hate Muslims (and label all of them insane radicals) for Islam’s views on women. Even though Islamic views on women are actually better than what Christian nationalists believe.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        6 months ago

        ‘‘Everyone is too reasonable for this to happen, despite the fact that the people in charge of every branch of government have repeatedly made it clear this is what they want to do’’

        Yes, most people are against this. Also most people are pro choice, or at the very least pro choice in cases of medical necessity, rape or incest, and most people are against laws specifically designed to ethnically clense the US of Hispanic people entirely, or laws that prevent children from accessing modem healthcare, or an unelected billionaire acting as though he’s the president.

        Most people being against something doesn’t mean they won’t do everything to make it happen. This has been in the works for the federalist society and so called family values groups and fundamentalist Christian nationalists for my entire life, this isn’t an accident that is happening now.

        • throwback3090@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          6 months ago

          You being pessimistic does not make you wise.

          It does, apparently, make you condescending. But not wise.

          • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            6 months ago

            And you saying “yeah, no” doesn’t constitute a rebuttal. There’s nothing in the Qur’an that isn’t in the Bible vis-à-vis the treatment of women. The only difference between Islamic societies is that they’ve convinced more people to take it literally, and it absolutely can happen in the US.

            • throwback3090@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              I do not get any better or worse sleep by telling you you’re rude. You may be under the delusion you are responding to someone else.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    6 months ago

    Project 2025 will create the Christian Taliban. I highly doubt the dumb fuck female MAGA voters will realize what they voted for.

      • JohnScig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        really… yeah, let’s shed a tear for the poor republican women, waving “Mass Deportation Now” signs. They didn’t seem to care about dehumanization so much then. Now they are the ones being dehumanized, hopefully they’ll remember how that feels come mid-terms.

        • commander@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Stooping to their level doesn’t make us better than them.

          Try to understand that most of them don’t know any better and are just trying to look good in front of their peers who also do not know any better.

          • JohnScig@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Look, I try. Most of the time. I’m trying to be empathetic and nice and inclusive. But sometimes I wonder while fully grown adults can’t use Google. Why they would believe the most obvious lies (“they’re eating the dogs” is a great example - an absurd lie that was debunked 100x by every outlet within days). Again these are fully grown adults who choose to be hateful, angry and wilfully ignorant. In fact they revel in that ignorance. Warnings are “alarmist”, factchecks are “biased”, opponents are “traitors”. These are fully grown adults that would trade the price of eggs for suffering of thousands of “illegals” and they entrust this trade to Donald Trump, a man who in his life has never taken a shot into a toilet that wasn’t made out of gold. Like yeah, sure, THAT guy is gonna care about the poor.

            My point is, we’re all adults, we all make our choices as best we can. But if you keep making the same terrible choices and yell at anyone who tries to tell you they are bad choices, well… You deserve what’s coming to you, because you’ve unleashed that on all of us.

      • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Dehumanizing? I am just saying they should get what they asked for. But here the thing: being a minority isn’t a choice, being gay isn’t a choice. Being a republican is. But if that is dehumanizing then so be it. They can join humanity again whenever they want.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It won’t affect republican women because the people running those voting stations won’t enforce the rule for “their own”.

    • Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      A passport always contains the current last name. If you took on a new one you have to get a new one issued. That’s standard pretty much all over the world.

      Edit: Ok, a lot of users wrote that there’s no ID card/paper that’s common in other parts of the world. In my country a driver license is not enough to prove my identity because it’s not an ID card.

      Guess you are fucked then.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        6 months ago

        Birth certificates can’t be changed and need to match, and that’s one of the forms of ID listed.

        Passports aren’t free, and not everyone has one to begin with. This blatantly stonewalls women, especially underprivileged women.

        • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Some states allow you to update your birth certificate after a legal name change. It’s definitely not universal, and much less likely in red states.

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Some states allow you to update your birth certificate after a legal name change.

            This also has a fee attached.

            It’s definitely not universal, and much less likely in red states.

            Yeah, even just checking, and it looks like Massachusetts doesn’t allow name changes for this purpose, and really only does it to correct mistakes at the time a record was made: "For example, you cannot change your birth record solely for a legal change of name. "

            Did they even think any of this through? LOL

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        No one in my family has a passport. So with this law only the men could vote, unless they spend the money to get a passport despite not aiming to travel.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Most citizens in the divided states of southern north america do not have a passport though. And a birth certificate doesn’t have your current last name on it if you took someone else’s in marriage. That’s the point.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Americans are pretty weird about their ID things.

        Other than a driver’s license, most of them don’t have any ID.

        They don’t have any sort of unique ID number either. They have a social security number, which is not guaranteed to be unique. Two people can have the same SSN. One person can have two SSNs. You’re apparently supposed to keep your SSN secret, but they’re assigned somewhat sequentially and they get leaked a lot. It’s a clusterfuck.

        • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          SSNs are guaranteed to be unique upon assignment. The problem is that so many leaks have happened that nearly everyone’s has been stolen and is being used in some type of financial identity theft. The thieves are the people with two (or more) SSNs.

        • Coriza@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          It is supposed to to keep your SSN secret and not carry the card with you everywhere but you have to memorize it and everyone and their dog is gonna ask for it. It is kinda scary how many times you have to give it out to random people over the phone or email.

        • throwback3090@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          The sad thing is this is kinda solved in the advertising space. Like, they know who I am, uniquely, including emails, phone numbers, and drivers license. The data is available, but banks (the primary users of the SSN) are perpetually stuck with 30yo tech.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          SSN is about the worst identifier, but they have revamped the process to remove some of those issues. It should no longer be possible for people to be issued the same number, and they’re no longer sequential or assigned in geographic blocks.

          Doesn’t change the existing ones, but going forward.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve fought tooth and nail against accepting this, but looking at their plans it’s becoming unavoidable: This will not end without violence.